Proposition 12
Tag 07EY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07EY].
Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 35, § 4. Locally convex spaces
Let and be two Fréchet spaces and a continuous linear mapping of on . Then there exists a section of that is continuous though not necessarily linear.
By prop. 11 there exists a distance in , invariant under translations, defining the topology of and for which open balls are convex. Given and in , let be the distance apart of the closed sets and in . As is a strict morphism (I, p. 17, th. 1) the remark of GT, IX, § 3.1 shows that is a distance on defining the topology of . We shall construct, inductively, a sequence of continuous mappings of in satisfying the following inequalities for all :
Suppose then that either , or and that has been constructed. Let ; as is surjective, the set is non-empty, and for , we have by the induction hypothesis. Therefore there exists a point of such that and for , . As the mapping is continuous, the set of points of which satisfy the inequalities and is an open neighbourhood of . Hence there exist an open covering of and constant mappings of in which satisfy the inequalities (2) and (3) in where one replaces by . As the space is metrisable, there exists a continuous partition of unity , that is locally finite and subordinate to the covering (GT, IX, § 4.5, th. 4 and § 4.4, cor. 1). For every , put . The mapping of in is continuous; as the open balls are convex in and in , the mapping satisfies the inequalities (2) and (3) for all .
From inequality (3) the mappings form a Cauchy sequence, for uniform convergence. As is complete, the sequence converges uniformly to a continuous mapping (GT, X, § 1.6); formula (2) shows that is the identity mapping of , thus is a continuous section of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- IX, § 3 not yet on this site
- IX, § 4 not yet on this site
- X, § 1 not yet on this site