Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 07EY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07EY].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 35, § 4. Locally convex spaces

Let EE and FF be two Fréchet spaces and uu a continuous linear mapping of EE on FF. Then there exists a section of uu that is continuous though not necessarily linear.

By prop. 11 there exists a distance dd in EE, invariant under translations, defining the topology of EE and for which open balls are convex. Given yy and y′y' in FF, let δ(y,y′)\delta(y, y') be the distance apart of the closed sets u−1(y)u^{-1}(y) and u−1(y′)u^{-1}(y') in EE. As uu is a strict morphism (I, p. 17, th. 1) the remark of GT, IX, § 3.1 shows that δ\delta is a distance on FF defining the topology of FF. We shall construct, inductively, a sequence of continuous mappings (sn)n∈N(s_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of FF in EE satisfying the following inequalities for all y∈Fy \in F:

δ(y,u(sn(y)))<2−n \delta(y, u(s_n(y))) < 2^{-n}
d(sn(y),sn−1(y))<2−n+1(only if n≥1). d(s_n(y), s_{n-1}(y)) < 2^{-n+1} \quad \text{(only if } n \geq 1 \text{)}.

Suppose then that either n=0n = 0, or n≥1n \geq 1 and that sn−1s_{n-1} has been constructed. Let y0∈Fy_0 \in F; as uu is surjective, the set u−1(y0)u^{-1}(y_0) is non-empty, and for n≥1n \geq 1, we have d(u−1(y0),sn−1(y0))<2−n+1d(u^{-1}(y_0), s_{n-1}(y_0)) < 2^{-n+1} by the induction hypothesis. Therefore there exists a point x0x_0 of EE such that u(x0)=y0u(x_0) = y_0 and for n≥1n \geq 1, d(x0,sn−1(y0))<2−n+1d(x_0, s_{n-1}(y_0)) < 2^{-n+1}. As the mapping sn−1s_{n-1} is continuous, the set of points yy of FF which satisfy the inequalities δ(y,y0)<2−n\delta(y, y_0) < 2^{-n} and d(x0,sn−1(y))<2−n+1d(x_0, s_{n-1}(y)) < 2^{-n+1} is an open neighbourhood of y0y_0. Hence there exist an open covering (Vi)i∈I(V_i)_{i \in I} of FF and constant mappings sn,is_{n,i} of FF in EE which satisfy the inequalities (2) and (3) in ViV_i where one replaces sns_n by sn,is_{n,i}. As the space FF is metrisable, there exists a continuous partition of unity (fi)i∈I(f_i)_{i \in I}, that is locally finite and subordinate to the covering (Vi)i∈I(V_i)_{i \in I} (GT, IX, § 4.5, th. 4 and § 4.4, cor. 1). For every y∈Fy \in F, put sn(y)=∑i∈Ifi(y)⋅sn,i(y)s_n(y) = \sum_{i \in I} f_i(y) \cdot s_{n,i}(y). The mapping sns_n of FF in EE is continuous; as the open balls are convex in EE and in FF, the mapping sns_n satisfies the inequalities (2) and (3) for all y∈Fy \in F.

From inequality (3) the mappings sn:F→Es_n : F \to E form a Cauchy sequence, for uniform convergence. As EE is complete, the sequence (sn)n∈N(s_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} converges uniformly to a continuous mapping s:F→Es : F \to E (GT, X, § 1.6); formula (2) shows that u∘su \circ s is the identity mapping of FF, thus ss is a continuous section of uu.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

  • IX, § 3 not yet on this site
  • IX, § 4 not yet on this site
  • X, § 1 not yet on this site
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.