Bourbaki

Example

Tag 07H1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07H1].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter II, § 6. Weak topologies

— 1) Let E be a vector space and let E* be its dual. The canonical bilinear form (x,x∗)↦⟨x,x∗⟩(x, x^*) \mapsto \langle x, x^* \rangle on E×E∗E \times E^* (A, II, § 2.3) puts E and E* in separating duality : for (D_{II}) is true because of the definition of the relation x∗≠0x^* \neq 0, and we know on the other hand, that for all x≠0x \neq 0 in E, there exists a linear form x∗∈E∗x^* \in E^* such that ⟨x,x∗⟩≠0\langle x, x^* \rangle \neq 0 (A, II, § 7.5, th. 6), which proves (D_I); the identifications of E with a subspace of E∗∗E^{**} is made here by the canonical mapping cEc_E (loc. cit.).

When E is of finite dimension, the only subspace G of E* that is in separating duality by the restriction to E×GE \times G of the canonical bilinear form, is the space E* itself ; for, E being then canonically identified with E∗∗E^{**} (loc. cit.), if we had G≠E∗G \neq E^*, there would exist a≠0a \neq 0 in E such that ⟨a,x∗⟩=0\langle a, x^* \rangle = 0 for all x∗∈Gx^* \in G (A, II, § 7.5, th. 7), which contradicts the hypothesis.

2) When E is an infinite dimensional vector space, and E' is a vector subspace of E*, the duality between E and E' defined by the restriction to E×E′E \times E' of the canonical bilinear form is always separating in E' ; it can be separating in E even if E′≠E∗E' \neq E^*. The most important case occurs where E is a topological vector space.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.