Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 07H6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07H6].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter II, § 6. Weak topologies

— Let FF and GG be two real vector spaces in duality. Every linear form on FF, that is continuous for σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G), can be written as x↦⟨x,y⟩x \mapsto \langle x, y \rangle for some y∈Gy \in G. The element y∈Gy \in G is unique when the duality is separating in GG.

For, to say that the linear form ff on FF is continuous for σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) means that there exists a finite set of points yi∈Gy_i \in G (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) such that, for all xx in FF, ∣f(x)∣≤sup⁡1≤i≤n∣⟨x,yi⟩∣|f(x)| \leq \sup_{1 \leq i \leq n} |\langle x, y_i \rangle| (II, p. 6, prop. 5). The nn relations ⟨x,yi⟩=0\langle x, y_i \rangle = 0 (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) imply therefore f(x)=0f(x) = 0, and hence (A, II, § 7.5, cor. 1), there exists a linear combination y=∑i=1nλiyiy = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i y_i such that f(x)=⟨x,y⟩f(x) = \langle x, y \rangle for all x∈Fx \in F. The uniqueness follows from (DII_\text{II}).

In other words, when the duality is separating in GG, and FF has the topology σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G), then we can identify GG canonically with the dual of FF for this topology (II, p. 42, def. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.