Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 07HB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07HB].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 44, § 6. Weak topologies

Let F and G be two (real) vector spaces in duality. For every set M of F we call the polar of M, the set of those y ∈ G for which ⟨x,y⟩≥−1\langle x, y \rangle \geq -1 for all x∈Mx \in M. (For complex vector spaces, cf. II, p. 64.)

If G1,G2G_1, G_2 are two subspaces of F∗F^* such that G1⊂G2G_1 \subset G_2, then the polar of M in G1G_1 is the intersection of G1G_1 with the polar of M in G2G_2.

When there is no danger of confusion we use M∘M^\circ to denote the polar, in G, of the subset M of F. Similarly we define the polar in F of a set in G.

Obviously, for every scalar λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 and all M⊂FM \subset F, we have (λM)∘=λ−1M∘(\lambda M)^\circ = \lambda^{-1} M^\circ. The relation M⊂N⊂FM \subset N \subset F implies N∘⊂M∘N^\circ \subset M^\circ; if N absorbs M then M∘M^\circ absorbs N∘N^\circ; for every family (Mα)(M_\alpha) of sets of F, the polar set of ⋃αMα\bigcup \alpha M_\alpha is the intersection of the polar sets Mα∘M_\alpha^\circ. Since, for y∈M∘y \in M^\circ, the closed half-spaces defined by the relations ⟨x,y⟩≥−1\langle x, y \rangle \geq -1 contain 0 and M, we see that if M1M_1 is the convex envelope of M∪{0}M \cup \{0\}, then M1∘=M∘M_1^\circ = M^\circ.

Clearly M⊂M∘∘M \subset M^{\circ \circ}. Hence

(M∘∘)∘⊂M∘⊂(M∘)∘∘=(M∘∘)∘ (M^{\circ \circ})^\circ \subset M^\circ \subset (M^\circ)^{\circ \circ} = (M^{\circ \circ})^\circ
i.e. M∘∘∘=M∘M^{\circ \circ \circ} = M^\circ (cf. S, III, § 1.5, prop. 2).

If M is a symmetric subset of F, M∘M^\circ is a symmetric subset of G; M∘M^\circ is also in this case the set of y∈Gy \in G such that ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤1|\langle x, y \rangle| \leq 1 for all x∈Mx \in M.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.