Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 07HC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07HC].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 44, § 6. Weak topologies

(i) For any set M of F, the polar set M∘M^\circ is a convex set that contains 0 and is closed in G for the topology σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F).

(ii) If M is a cone of vertex 0, then M∘M^\circ is a cone of vertex 0 and it is also the set of y∈Gy \in G such that ⟨x,y⟩≥0\langle x, y \rangle \geq 0 for all x∈Mx \in M.

(iii) If M is a vector subspace of F, then M∘M^\circ is a vector subspace of G, and it is also the set of y∈Gy \in G such that ⟨x,y⟩=0\langle x, y \rangle = 0 for all x∈Mx \in M.

(i) Since the linear forms y↦⟨x,y⟩y \mapsto \langle x, y \rangle are continuous for σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F) the statement follows immediately from the definitions and the fact that a half-space determined by a hyperplane is convex.

(ii) If M is a cone with vertex 0 and if x∈M,y∈M∘x \in M, y \in M^\circ, then as λx∈M\lambda x \in M, for all λ>0\lambda > 0, we have ⟨λx,y⟩≥−1\langle \lambda x, y \rangle \geq -1, i.e. λ⟨x,y⟩≥−1\lambda \langle x, y \rangle \geq -1. Since this holds for all λ>0\lambda > 0, it follows that ⟨x,y⟩≥0\langle x, y \rangle \geq 0, and (ii) is proved.

(iii) Similarly, if M is a vector subspace of F, the relations x∈M,y∈M∘x \in M, y \in M^\circ imply, this time, that λ⟨x,y⟩≥−1\lambda \langle x, y \rangle \geq -1 for all real λ\lambda which is possible only if ⟨x,y⟩=0\langle x, y \rangle = 0.

If M is a vector subspace of F we say that M∘M^\circ is the orthogonal of M in G; if G⊂F∗G \subset F^*, then M∘M^\circ is the intersection of G, and of the subspace orthogonal to M in the algebraic dual F∗F^* of F (A, II, § 2.4, def. 4).

For a vector subspace M of F and a vector subspace N of G we say that M and N are orthogonal if M⊂NoM \subset N^o (or, equivalently, if N⊂M∘N \subset M^\circ).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.