Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 07HG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07HG].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter II, § 6. Weak topologies

— Every neighbourhood of 0 in GG in the topology σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F) contains a neighbourhood VV defined by a finite number of inequalities of the form ∣⟨xi,y⟩∣≤1|\langle x_i, y \rangle| \leq 1 (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n), where the xix_i are arbitrary points of FF. If AA is the symmetric convex envelope of the set of the xix_i, then VV is the polar set A∘A^\circ of AA in GG. We can say that the polars in GG of finite symmetric sets in FF (or of their convex envelopes) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 in GG for σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F). If the duality is separating in FF, these convex envelopes are compact for σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) (II, p. 14, cor. 1 of prop. 15), and of finite dimensions. Conversely every compact, convex set of finite dimension CC in FF (with the σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) topology) is contained in the convex envelope of a finite subset of FF. For, let MM be a vector subspace of finite dimension containing CC. If (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is a basis of MM, we can suppose that CC is contained in the closed parallelope centre 0 and constructed on the vectors of the basis eie_i (GT, VI, § 1.3); now it is immediate that this parallelope is the convex envelope of the points ∑i=1nεiei\sum \limits_{i=1}^n \varepsilon_i e_i with εi=±1\varepsilon_i = \pm 1.

Thus we can say that (if σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) is Hausdorff) the polars of finite dimensional, convex, compact sets in FF (for σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) or for any Hausdorff locally convex topology finer than σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) on FF) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 for σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.