Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 07I0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07I0].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 52, § 6. Weak topologies

Let GG be a real vector space and F=G∗F = G^* its dual with the topology σ(G∗,G)\sigma(G^*, G).

(i) The mapping V↦V∘V \mapsto V^\circ is a bijection of the set of vector subspaces of GG on the set of closed vector subspaces of FF.

(ii) Every closed vector subspace of FF is a product of lines and has a topological complement.

By the bipolar theorem (II, p. 45, cor. 2) V↦V∘V \mapsto V^\circ is a bijection of the set of vector subspaces VV of GG, closed for σ(G,G∗)\sigma(G, G^*) on the set of closed vector subspaces of FF. But, by definition, every linear form on GG is continuous for σ(G,G∗)\sigma(G, G^*), therefore every vector subspace in GG is closed, being defined by a system of equations ⟨y,yλ∗⟩=0\langle y, y_\lambda^* \rangle = 0 (where yλ∗∈G∗y_\lambda^* \in G^*); this proves (i).

Now let WW be a closed subspace of FF; we have then W=V∘W = V^\circ with V=W∘V = W^\circ in GG. Let V′V' be a complement of VV in GG. We know that F=G∗F = G^* can be canonically identified with V∗⊕V′∗V^* \oplus {V'}^*, and V′∗{V'}^* identified with V∘=WV^\circ = W (A, II, § 2.6, cor. to prop. 10); further (II, p. 50, prop. 8) the topology σ(G∗,G)\sigma(G^*, G) can be identified with the product of the topologies σ(V∗,V)\sigma(V^*, V) and σ(V′∗,V′)\sigma({V'}^*, V'); this proves assertion (ii).

Though, for the topology σ(G,G∗)\sigma(G, G^*), every vector subspace of GG is closed, we note that if GG is of infinite dimension then the topology σ(G,G∗)\sigma(G, G^*) is not the finest locally convex topology on GG, every neighbourhood of 0 for σ(G,G∗)\sigma(G, G^*) containing a vector subspace of infinite dimension : it is however the finest of the weak topologies on GG (II, p. 43, cor. 3).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.