Proposition 10
Tag 07I0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07I0].
Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 52, § 6. Weak topologies
Let be a real vector space and its dual with the topology .
(i) The mapping is a bijection of the set of vector subspaces of on the set of closed vector subspaces of .
(ii) Every closed vector subspace of is a product of lines and has a topological complement.
By the bipolar theorem (II, p. 45, cor. 2) is a bijection of the set of vector subspaces of , closed for on the set of closed vector subspaces of . But, by definition, every linear form on is continuous for , therefore every vector subspace in is closed, being defined by a system of equations (where ); this proves (i).
Now let be a closed subspace of ; we have then with in . Let be a complement of in . We know that can be canonically identified with , and identified with (A, II, § 2.6, cor. to prop. 10); further (II, p. 50, prop. 8) the topology can be identified with the product of the topologies and ; this proves assertion (ii).
Though, for the topology , every vector subspace of is closed, we note that if is of infinite dimension then the topology is not the finest locally convex topology on , every neighbourhood of 0 for containing a vector subspace of infinite dimension : it is however the finest of the weak topologies on (II, p. 43, cor. 3).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.