Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Eberlein)

Tag 07VT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07VT].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 5. Compactness criteria

— Let E be a Hausdorff and quasi-complete locally convex space, T\mathscr{T} a topology on E which is compatible with the duality between E and E' and A a subset of E. For A to be relatively compact for T\mathscr{T}, it is necessary and sufficient that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E for T\mathscr{T}.

The condition stated is obviously necessary.

Suppose now that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point for T\mathscr{T}, hence also for the coarser topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). Then A is precompact for T\mathscr{T} (IV, p. 32, prop. 1); in order that A be relatively compact for T\mathscr{T}, it is necessary and sufficient that it be so for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') (loc. cit.). Therefore it is enough to prove the theorem when T\mathscr{T} is the weakened topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E').

Let E^\hat{E} denote the completion of E, which we shall identify as usual with a subspace of the algebraic dual E′∗{E'}^* of E' (III, p. 21, th. 2). Let EσE_\sigma, E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma and Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* denote the spaces E, E^\hat{E} and E′∗{E'}^* endowed with the topologies σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), σ(E^,E′)\sigma(\hat{E}, E') and σ(E′∗,E′)\sigma({E'}^*, E') respectively.

Let (xi′)i∈I(x'_i)_{i \in I} be a basis of the vector space E' over the field K. The mapping f↦(f(xi′))i∈If \mapsto (f(x'_i))_{i \in I} is a homeomorphism ϕ\phi from Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* onto KIK^I; for every i∈Ii \in I, the image of A under the mapping xi′x'_i from E into K is relatively compact : for, K is metrizable and every infinite sequence of elements of xi′(A)x'_i(A) has a limit point. It follows that ϕ(A)\phi(A) is relatively compact in KIK^I, hence that the closure A‾\overline{A} of A in Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* is compact.

Next we shall prove that A‾\overline{A} is contained in E^\hat{E}. Let H be an equicontinuous subset of E'; let X be its closure for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E); X is compact (III, p. 17, cor. 2). For every x∈E′∗x \in {E'}^*, let ϕx\phi_x be the restriction of x′↦⟨x,x′⟩x' \mapsto \langle x, x' \rangle to X; let A~⊂Cs(X)\tilde{A} \subset \mathscr{C}_s(X) be the set of functions ϕx\phi_x as x ranges over A. In view of the hypothesis on A, every infinite sequence of elements of A~\tilde{A} has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X); by prop. 2 (IV, p. 33), the set A~\tilde{A} is therefore relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). It follows that for every a∈A‾a \in \overline{A}, the function ϕa\phi_a on X is continuous. The inclusion A‾⊂E^\overline{A} \subset \hat{E} then follows from th. 2 of III, p. 21.

Now we shall show that A‾\overline{A} is contained in E. Since A is precompact in EσE_\sigma (IV, p. 32, prop. 1), it is bounded in EσE_\sigma (III, p. 3, prop. 2), hence also in E (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Let C be the closed convex balanced envelope of A in E. Then C is bounded since A is bounded, hence complete since E is quasi-complete. In other words, C is a convex and closed subset of E^\hat{E}, so also of E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Since A⊂CA \subset C and the topology of E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma is induced by that of Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^*, we have A‾⊂C\overline{A} \subset C, and hence A‾⊂E\overline{A} \subset E.

Since the topology of EσE_\sigma is induced by that of Eσ′∗{E'_\sigma}^*, the subset A‾\overline{A} of EσE_\sigma is compact, and th. 1 follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.