Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 07WL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07WL].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, Appendix 0. Fixed points of groups of affine transformations

The set K of means on X is the subset of the unit ball of the dual of the Banach space E=B(X;R)E = \mathscr{B}(X; \mathbf{R}) whose elements are the linear forms μ\mu such that μ(1)=1\mu(1) = 1. It is a subset of E′E' which is convex and compact for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E).

Let μ\mu be a linear form on E, such that μ(1)=1\mu(1) = 1. For every function f∈Ef \in E, we define the function f′∈Ef' \in E by f′(x)=∥f∥−f(x)f'(x) = \|f\| - f(x) (x∈Xx \in X). First assume that μ\mu is a mean; for every f∈Ef \in E, we have f′≥0f' \geq 0, hence μ(f′)≥0\mu(f') \geq 0, i.e. μ(f)≤∥f∥\mu(f) \leq \|f\|; therefore ∥μ∥≤1\|\mu\| \leq 1.

Conversely, suppose μ\mu belongs to E′E', and that ∥μ∥≤1\| \mu \| \leq 1; for every positive function f∈Ef \in E, we have μ(f′)≤∥f′∥\mu(f') \leq \| f' \|, hence

∥f∥−μ(f)=μ(f′)≤∥f′∥≤∥f∥, \| f \| - \mu(f) = \mu(f') \leq \| f' \| \leq \| f \|,

and finally μ(f)≥0\mu(f) \geq 0; consequently, μ\mu is a mean.

It is clear that KK is convex; that it is compact for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E) follows from cor. 3 of III, p. 17.

Q.E.D.

Let Γ\Gamma be a set of continuous mappings from XX into XX which commute pairwise. Let γ∈Γ\gamma \in \Gamma. For every function f∈Ef \in E, we have f∘γ∈Ef \circ \gamma \in E; hence we can define an affine transformation uγu_{\gamma} on the set KK of means on XX, by

uγμ(f)=μ(f∘γ)(μ∈K,f∈E). u_{\gamma} \mu(f) = \mu(f \circ \gamma) \quad (\mu \in K, f \in E).

If KK is assigned the topology induced by σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E), the mapping uγu_{\gamma} is continuous. If γ\gamma is a homeomorphism, uγμu_{\gamma} \mu can be deduced from μ\mu by transport of structure. Finally, we have uγuγ′=uγ′γuγu_{\gamma} u_{\gamma'} = u_{\gamma' \gamma} u_{\gamma} for all γ,γ′\gamma, \gamma' in Γ\Gamma. By the Markoff-Kakutani th. (IV, p. 39, th. 1), there exists a mean μ\mu on XX, such that uγμ=μu_{\gamma} \mu = \mu for all γ∈Γ\gamma \in \Gamma; in other words, μ\mu satisfies the relation μ(f)=μ(f∘γ)\mu(f) = \mu(f \circ \gamma) for f∈Ef \in E and γ∈Γ\gamma \in \Gamma.

In an analogous way, the corollary of th. 1 (IV, p. 40) implies the following result:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.