Bourbaki

Theorem 3

Tag 07Y0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07Y0].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 1. Prehilbertian spaces and hilbertian spaces

Let EE be a hilbertian space. For every x∈Ex \in E, let x∗x^* be the continuous linear form y↦⟨x∣y⟩y \mapsto \langle x | y \rangle on EE; the mapping x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* is a bijective, semi-linear (for the automorphism ξ↦ξˉ\xi \mapsto \bar{\xi}) mapping from EE onto its dual E′E', and an isometry from the normed space EE onto the normed space E′E'.

The mapping x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* is semi-linear by (2) (V, p. 1) and by virtue of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have ∥x∗∥=sup⁡∥y∥≤1∣⟨x∣y⟩∣=∥x∥\|x^*\| = \sup_{\|y\| \leq 1} |\langle x | y \rangle| = \|x\|, hence x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* is an isometry from EE into E′E', and in particular, is injective. To complete the proof, we need to prove that for all x′≠0x' \neq 0 in E′E', there exists x∈Ex \in E such that x′=x∗x' = x^*. But the hyperplane H=Ker x′H = \mathrm{Ker}\, x' is closed in EE; its orthogonal is a line DD. Let bb be a non-zero element of DD; the kernel of the linear form b∗b^* is equal to HH and hence there exists a scalar λ≠0\lambda \neq 0 such that x′=λ⋅b∗=(λ‾⋅b)∗x' = \lambda \cdot b^* = (\overline{\lambda} \cdot b)^*. Q.E.D.

The mapping x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* from EE onto its dual E′E' is said to be canonical. The inverse mapping from E′E' onto EE is also called canonical and is denoted by x′↦x′∗x' \mapsto {x'}^*. We have

⟨x∣y⟩=⟨y,x∗⟩,⟨x,x′⟩=⟨x′∗∣x⟩ \langle x | y \rangle = \langle y, x^* \rangle, \quad \langle x, x' \rangle = \langle {x'}^* | x \rangle

for x,yx, y in EE and x′x' in E′E'. Also (x∗)∗=x(x^*)^* = x for x∈Ex \in E.

When K is R\mathbf{R}, the mapping x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* is linear. We shall transfer the scalar product of E to E' by this mapping. When K=CK = \mathbf{C}, we can consider the mapping x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* as an isomorphism from the vector space E‾\overline{E}, the conjugate of E onto E' (V, p. 6). We shall transfer the scalar product of E‾\overline{E} to E' by this mapping.

In the two cases considered, E' is a hilbertian space and we have the formulae

⟨x∗∣y∗⟩=⟨x∣y⟩‾,⟨x′∣x′⟩=∥x′∥2 \langle x^*|y^* \rangle = \overline{\langle x|y \rangle}, \quad \langle x'|x' \rangle = \|x'\|^2

for x,yx, y in E and x′x' in E'.

To say that the vector x∈Ex \in E is orthogonal to a vector y∈Ey \in E is equivalent to saying that the linear form x∗∈E′x^* \in E' is orthogonal to yy in the sense defined in II, p. 41 (this justifies the use of the word « orthogonal » in the two cases). If M is a closed vector subspace of E, the subspace M∘M^\circ orthogonal to M in E' (II, p. 44) is the image under x↦x∗x \mapsto x^* of the orthogonal of M in E, defined in V, p. 13 (this justifies the use of the notation M∘M^\circ in the two cases).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.