Theorem 3
Tag 07Y0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07Y0].
Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 1. Prehilbertian spaces and hilbertian spaces
Let be a hilbertian space. For every , let be the continuous linear form on ; the mapping is a bijective, semi-linear (for the automorphism ) mapping from onto its dual , and an isometry from the normed space onto the normed space .
The mapping is semi-linear by (2) (V, p. 1) and by virtue of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have , hence is an isometry from into , and in particular, is injective. To complete the proof, we need to prove that for all in , there exists such that . But the hyperplane is closed in ; its orthogonal is a line . Let be a non-zero element of ; the kernel of the linear form is equal to and hence there exists a scalar such that . Q.E.D.
The mapping from onto its dual is said to be canonical. The inverse mapping from onto is also called canonical and is denoted by . We have
for in and in . Also for .
When K is , the mapping is linear. We shall transfer the scalar product of E to E' by this mapping. When , we can consider the mapping as an isomorphism from the vector space , the conjugate of E onto E' (V, p. 6). We shall transfer the scalar product of to E' by this mapping.
In the two cases considered, E' is a hilbertian space and we have the formulae
for in E and in E'.
To say that the vector is orthogonal to a vector is equivalent to saying that the linear form is orthogonal to in the sense defined in II, p. 41 (this justifies the use of the word « orthogonal » in the two cases). If M is a closed vector subspace of E, the subspace orthogonal to M in E' (II, p. 44) is the image under of the orthogonal of M in E, defined in V, p. 13 (this justifies the use of the notation in the two cases).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.