Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 081O, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 081O].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 4. Some classes of operators in hilbertian spaces

Let u be a continuous and positive endomorphism of E, and F\mathscr{F} the set of all finite rank orthoprojectors on E. Then for every orthonormal basis (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} of E, we have (in R+\mathbf{R}_+) the equality

∑i∈I⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩=sup⁡p∈Fτ(pup). \sum_{i \in I} \langle e_i|u(e_i) \rangle = \sup_{p \in \mathscr{F}} \tau(pup).

For every finite subset J of I, put pJ=∑i∈Jeiei∗p_J = \sum_{i \in J} e_i e_i^*; this is the orthoprojector from E onto the vector subspace generated by the vectors eie_i, where i ranges over J. We have

pJupJ=∑i∈J,j∈J⟨ei∣u(ej)⟩eiej∗, p_J u p_J = \sum_{i \in J, j \in J} \langle e_i | u(e_j) \rangle e_i e_j^* ,
hence τ(pJupJ)=∑i∈J⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩\tau(p_J u p_J) = \sum_{i \in J} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle. Since pJ∈Fp_J \in \mathscr{F},
∑i∈J⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩≤sup⁡p∈Fτ(pup); \sum_{i \in J} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle \leq \sup_{p \in \mathscr{F}} \tau(p u p) ;
and so we conclude that
∑i∈I⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩=sup⁡J∑i∈J⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩≤sup⁡p∈Fτ(pup). \sum_{i \in I} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle = \sup_J \sum_{i \in J} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle \leq \sup_{p \in \mathscr{F}} \tau(p u p) .

Let vv be a finite rank continuous and positive endomorphism of E and let p∈Fp \in \mathscr{F}. By th. 2 of V, p. 23 there exists an orthonormal basis (fα)α∈A(f_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} of E and a finite subset B of A such that (fα)α∈B(f_\alpha)_{\alpha \in B} is an orthonormal basis of the image of p. Then we have p=∑α∈Bfαfα∗p = \sum_{\alpha \in B} f_\alpha f_\alpha^*, and so, as above, the relation τ(pvp)=∑α∈B⟨fα∣v(fα)⟩\tau(p v p) = \sum_{\alpha \in B} \langle f_\alpha | v(f_\alpha) \rangle. By lemma 2 (V, p. 48) we have τ(v)=∑α∈A⟨fα∣v(fα)⟩\tau(v) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \langle f_\alpha | v(f_\alpha) \rangle, which gives the formula

∑α∈B⟨fα∣v(fα)⟩≤τ(v). \sum_{\alpha \in B} \langle f_\alpha | v(f_\alpha) \rangle \leq \tau(v) .
Applying this inequality to the case where v=pJ.upJv = p_J . u p_J and where J is a finite subset of I, we get
∑α∈B⟨pJ(fα)∣upJ(fα)⟩≤∑i∈J⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩. \sum_{\alpha \in B} \langle p_J(f_\alpha) | u p_J(f_\alpha) \rangle \leq \sum_{i \in J} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle .
For every x∈Ex \in E, we have pJ(x)=∑i∈J⟨ei∣x⟩eip_J(x) = \sum_{i \in J} \langle e_i | x \rangle e_i, and so x=lim⁡JpJ(x)x = \lim_J p_J(x) with respect to the ordered directed set of finite subsets J of I. Passing to the limit over J in (23), we get
τ(pup)=∑α∈B⟨fα∣u(fα)⟩≤∑i∈I⟨ei∣u(ei)⟩, \tau(p u p) = \sum_{\alpha \in B} \langle f_\alpha | u(f_\alpha) \rangle \leq \sum_{i \in I} \langle e_i | u(e_i) \rangle ,
and this completes the proof of lemma 3.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.