For every point (t0,x0) of J×E let u(t,t0,x0) be the integral of the homogeneous equation (4) defined on J and equal to x0 at t0. 1. For every point t∈J the map x0↦u(t,t0,x0) is a bijective bicontinuous linear map C(t,t0) of E to itself. 2. The map t↦C(t,t0) of J into L(E) is identical to the integral of the homogeneous linear differential equation
dtdU=A(t) U which takes the value I **(the identity map of*
E to itself) at the point t0. 3.
For any points s,t,u of J C(s,u)=C(s,t)C(t,u),C(s,t)=(C(t,s))−1.
By prop. 1, u(t,t0,x1)+u(t,t0,x2) (resp. λu(t,t0,x0)) is an integral of (4) and takes the value x1+x2 (resp. λx0) at t0, so, by th. 1 of IV, p. 179, is identical to u(t,t0,x1+x2) (resp. u(t,t0,λx0)); the map x0↦u(t,t0,x0) is thus a linear map C(t,t0) of E into itself, and one can write u(t,t0,x0)=C(t,t0).x0.
Since the map (X,Y)↦XY of L(E)×L(E) into L(E) is continuous (Gen. Top., X, p. 298, prop. 8), the map t↦A(t)U of J into L(E) is regulated for all U∈L(E); further (Gen. Top., X, p. 296)
∥A(t)X−A(t)Y∥=∥A(t)(X−Y)∥≤∥A(t)∥∥X−Y∥,
so one can apply th. I of IV, p. 179 to the homogeneous linear equation (5); let V(t) be the integral of this equation defined on J and equal to I at t0. One has (I, p. 6, prop. 3)
dtd(V(t)x0)=dtdV(t)x0=A(t)(V(t)x0)
and for t=t0 we have V(t)x0=Ix0=x0; by th. 1 of IV, p. 179 one must have V(t).x0=C(t,t0)x0 for all x0∈E, that is, V(t)=C(t,t0); this proves that C(t,t0) belongs to L(E), in other words, that x0↦C(t,t0).x0 is continuous on E, and that the map t↦C(t,t0) is the integral of (5) which is equal to I at t0.
Finally, the integral s↦C(s,u).x0 of (4) is equal to C(t,u).x0 at the point t, so, by definition,
C(s,u).x0=C(s,t)(C(t,u).x0)=(C(s,t)C(t,u)).x0
for any x0∈E, whence the first relation (6); since C(s,s)=I one has C(s,t)C(t,s)=I, for any s and t in J; this proves (Set Theory, II, p. 86, corollary) that C(t,t0) is a bijective map of E onto itself, with inverse map C(t0,t). This completes the proof of the theorem.
One says that C(t,t0) is the resolvent of equation (2) of IV, p. 178.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.