Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 08GW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08GW].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter V, Appendix 0. Hardy Fields. (H) Functions

Two functions in the same Hardy field are comparable to any order (V, p. 232).

Indeed, if ff belongs to a Hardy field K\mathscr{K}, then for every integer n>0n > 0 there exists an interval [x0,+∞[[x_0, +\infty[ on which ff is nn times differentiable, its nthn^{th} derivative being equal to a function in K\mathscr{K} on this interval. It is therefore enough to show that any two functions f,gf, g of K\mathscr{K} are comparable. This is evident if one of the functions is identically zero on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty; one may therefore restrict oneself to the case where they are both strictly positive on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty. But then, for every real number tt, f−tgf - tg is equal to a function in K\mathscr{K} on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty, so has constant sign on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty, which proves the proposition (V, p. 217, prop. 9).

One deduces immediately from this proposition that, if a Hardy field K\mathscr{K} contains the real constants (as we shall always assume in what follows), and if ff and gg are any two functions in K\mathscr{K} then any two of the functions ef,eg,log⁡∣f∣,log⁡∣g∣,∣f∣α,∣g∣αe^f, e^g, \log |f|, \log |g|, |f|^{\alpha}, |g|^{\alpha} (α\alpha an arbitrary real), ∫af,∫ag\int_a f, \int_a g (aa being any real number in an interval [x0,+∞[[x_0, +\infty[ where ff and gg are regulated) are comparable (when they are defined); indeed, any two of these functions belong to a given Hardy field obtained by adjoining them successively to K\mathscr{K}.

Similarly, every function f(x)f(x) in a Hardy field K\mathscr{K} is comparable to xx, since xx and f(x)f(x) belong to the Hardy field obtained by adjoining xx to K\mathscr{K}. One thus concludes (in particular) that ff is comparable to any order to every power xαx^{\alpha}, as well as to log⁡x\log x and to exe^x.

One also sees that if ff and gg belong to the same Hardy field K\mathscr{K}, if g(x)>0g(x) > 0 on an interval [x0,+∞[[x_0, +\infty[, and if g(x)g(x) tends to 0 or to +∞+\infty as xx tends to +∞+\infty, then the order of ff relative to gg (V, p. 219) is always defined.

Prop. 8 of V, p. 233, is therefore applicable to every function ff in a Hardy field, and proves that:

1) if ff is of order +∞+\infty relative to xx then ∫axf(t) dt∼(f(x))2/f′(x)\int_a^x f(t)\,dt \sim (f(x))^2/f'(x).

2) if ff is of order μ>−1\mu > -1 relative to xx then ∫axf(t) dt∼1μ+1xf(x)\int_a^x f(t)\,dt \sim \frac{1}{\mu+1} x f(x).

3) if ff is of order μ<−1\mu < -1 relative to xx then ∫a+∞f(t) dt∼−1μ+1xf(x)\int_a^{+\infty} f(t)\,dt \sim -\frac{1}{\mu+1} x f(x).

4) if ff is of order −∞-\infty relative to xx then ∫a+∞f(t) dt∼−(f(x))2/f′(x)\int_a^{+\infty} f(t)\,dt \sim -(f(x))^2/f'(x).

Further, we have the following proposition:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.