Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 08H3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08H3].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter V, Appendix 0. Hardy Fields. (H) Functions

Let g be an (H) function not equivalent to a constant ≠0\neq 0, and such that g(x)≪xg(x) \ll x, and let u(x)u(x) be the inverse function of x−g(x)x - g(x), defined on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty. Let (un)(u_n) be the sequence of functions defined, by recursion on nn, by the conditions u0(x)=xu_0(x) = x, un(x)=x+g(un−1(x))u_n(x) = x + g(u_{n-1}(x)) for n⩾1n \geqslant 1; then un≫1u_n \gg 1 and

u(x)−un(x)∼g(x)(g′(x))n. u(x) - u_n(x) \sim g(x)(g'(x))^n.
(11)

Let us put y=u(x)y = u(x), yn=un(x)y_n = u_n(x); then x=y−g(y)x = y - g(y), y0=xy_0 = x and yn=x+g(yn+1)y_n = x + g(y_{n+1}). One first deduces that x/y=1−g(y)yx/y = 1 - \frac{g(y)}{y}; since yy tends to +∞+\infty with xx, the hypothesis g(x)≪xg(x) \ll x shows that y=u(x)∼x=y0y = u(x) \sim x = y_0; further,

y−x=g(y)=g(x)+(y−x)g′(z) y - x = g(y) = g(x) + (y - x)g'(z)
where zz belongs to the interval with endpoints x,yx, y; when xx tends to +∞+\infty so does zz, and since g(x)≪xg(x) \ll x, g′≪1g' \ll 1, thus g′(z)g'(z) tends to 0, and consequently
y−x=g(x)+o(y−x) y - x = g(x) + o(y - x)

whence

u(x)−x∼g(x). u(x) - x \sim g(x).
(12)

In the second place we show, by recursion on nn, that when xx tends to +∞+\infty one has un≫1u_n \gg 1, and

u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−un−1(x). u(x) - u_n(x) \ll u(x) - u_{n-1}(x).
(13)

Indeed, y−yn=g(y)−g(yn−1)=(y−yn−1)g′(zn−1)y - y_n = g(y) - g(y_{n-1}) = (y - y_{n-1})g'(z_{n-1}), where zn−1z_{n-1} belongs to the interval with endpoints yy and yn−1y_{n-1}; by the induction hypothesis zn−1z_{n-1} tends to +∞+\infty with xx, and so g′(zn−1)g'(z_{n-1}) tends to 0, which proves (13). One deduces from this relation and from (12) that u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−x∼g(x)≪x∼u(x)u(x) - u_n(x) \ll u(x) - x \sim g(x) \ll x \sim u(x), whence un(x)∼u(x)u_n(x) \sim u(x) and consequently un≫1u_n \gg 1. Finally, the relation u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−xu(x) - u_n(x) \ll u(x) - x can also be written (u(x)−x)−(un(x)−x)≪u(x)−x(u(x) - x) - (u_n(x) - x) \ll u(x) - x, whence

un(x)−x∼u(x)−x∼g(x). u_n(x) - x \sim u(x) - x \sim g(x).
(14)

To prove (11), first remark that if t(x)t(x) is a function such that t(x)−x∼g(x)t(x) - x \sim g(x), then one has g′(t(x))∼g′(x)g'(t(x)) \sim g'(x). Indeed, for any ε>0\varepsilon > 0, for xx sufficiently large g′g' is monotone, so g′(t(x))g'(t(x)) lies between g′(x+(1+ε)g(x))g'(x + (1 + \varepsilon)g(x)) and g′(x+(1−ε)g(x))g'(x + (1 - \varepsilon)g(x)). Prop. 4 of V, p. 255, shows that g′(t(x))∼g′(x)g'(t(x)) \sim g'(x), provided one has established the relation g≪g′/g′′g \ll g'/g''. Now, if gg is of infinite order relative to xx one has (V, p. 251, prop. 2) g′′/g′∼g′/gg''/g' \sim g'/g, and, since g′≪1,g≪g/g′∼g′/g′′g' \ll 1, g \ll g/g' \sim g'/g''; if gg is of finite order μ\mu relative to xx one necessarily has μ≤1\mu \leq 1; if μ<1\mu < 1, since gg is not equivalent to a constant ≠0\neq 0, formulae (3) and (4) (V, p. 251) show that g′′/g′∼k/xg''/g' \sim k/x (kk constant ≠0\neq 0), whence again g≪g′/g′′g \ll g'/g''; finally, if μ=1\mu = 1 then g′g' is of order 0 relative to xx, so g′′/g′≪1/xg''/g' \ll 1/x, and so again g≪g′/g′′g \ll g'/g''.

This being so, since zn−1z_{n-1} lies between yy and yny_n, it follows from (14) that zn−1−x∼g(x)z_{n-1} - x \sim g(x), whence g′(zn−1)∼g′(x)g'(z_{n-1}) \sim g'(x) by the above; thus

y−yn∼(y−yn−1)g′(x), y - y_n \sim (y - y_{n-1})g'(x),
whence we obtain (11) by induction on nn.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.