Let g be an (H) function not equivalent to a constant =0, and such that g(x)≪x, and let u(x) be the inverse function of x−g(x), defined on a neighbourhood of +∞. Let (un) be the sequence of functions defined, by recursion on n, by the conditions u0(x)=x, un(x)=x+g(un−1(x)) for n⩾1; then un≫1 and
u(x)−un(x)∼g(x)(g′(x))n. (11)
Let us put y=u(x), yn=un(x); then x=y−g(y), y0=x and yn=x+g(yn+1). One first deduces that x/y=1−yg(y); since y tends to +∞ with x, the hypothesis g(x)≪x shows that y=u(x)∼x=y0; further,
y−x=g(y)=g(x)+(y−x)g′(z) where
z belongs to the interval with endpoints
x,y; when
x tends to
+∞ so does
z, and since
g(x)≪x,
g′≪1, thus
g′(z) tends to 0, and consequently
y−x=g(x)+o(y−x)
whence
u(x)−x∼g(x). (12)
In the second place we show, by recursion on n, that when x tends to +∞ one has un≫1, and
u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−un−1(x). (13)
Indeed, y−yn=g(y)−g(yn−1)=(y−yn−1)g′(zn−1), where zn−1 belongs to the interval with endpoints y and yn−1; by the induction hypothesis zn−1 tends to +∞ with x, and so g′(zn−1) tends to 0, which proves (13). One deduces from this relation and from (12) that u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−x∼g(x)≪x∼u(x), whence un(x)∼u(x) and consequently un≫1. Finally, the relation u(x)−un(x)≪u(x)−x can also be written (u(x)−x)−(un(x)−x)≪u(x)−x, whence
un(x)−x∼u(x)−x∼g(x). (14)
To prove (11), first remark that if t(x) is a function such that t(x)−x∼g(x), then one has g′(t(x))∼g′(x). Indeed, for any ε>0, for x sufficiently large g′ is monotone, so g′(t(x)) lies between g′(x+(1+ε)g(x)) and g′(x+(1−ε)g(x)). Prop. 4 of V, p. 255, shows that g′(t(x))∼g′(x), provided one has established the relation g≪g′/g′′. Now, if g is of infinite order relative to x one has (V, p. 251, prop. 2) g′′/g′∼g′/g, and, since g′≪1,g≪g/g′∼g′/g′′; if g is of finite order μ relative to x one necessarily has μ≤1; if μ<1, since g is not equivalent to a constant =0, formulae (3) and (4) (V, p. 251) show that g′′/g′∼k/x (k constant =0), whence again g≪g′/g′′; finally, if μ=1 then g′ is of order 0 relative to x, so g′′/g′≪1/x, and so again g≪g′/g′′.
This being so, since zn−1 lies between y and yn, it follows from (14) that zn−1−x∼g(x), whence g′(zn−1)∼g′(x) by the above; thus
y−yn∼(y−yn−1)g′(x), whence we obtain (11) by induction on
n.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.