Let p and q be two (H) functions which are strictly positive on an interval [x0,+∞[.
1° If q≪p/p′ one has p(x+q(x))∼p(x). 2° If both q≪p/p′ and q(x)≪x then p(x−q(x))∼p(x).
The two parts of this proposition are clear if p∼k (constant =0); one may therefore suppose that p(x)≪1 (otherwise one applies the argument to 1/p). One then deduces p′(x)≪1.
1° One can write p(x+q(x))=p(x)+q(x)p′(x+θq(x)) with 0≤θ≤1 (I, p. 14, corollary). Since ∣p′(x)∣ tends to 0 as x tends to +∞, and is equal to an (H) function on a neighbourhood of +∞, it is decreasing on an interval [x1,+∞[, so, for x≥x1, one has ∣p′(x+θq(x))∣≤∣p′(x)∣; since qp′≪p one has p(x+q(x))∼p(x).
2° The condition q(x)≪x ensures that x−q(x) tends to +∞ with x. Again one has p(x−q(x))=p(x)−q(x)p′(x−θp(x)) with 0≤θ≤1. The same argument as in the first part of the proof shows that, for x sufficiently large, ∣p′(x−θq(x))∣≤∣p′(x−q(x))∣. It reduces to showing that q(x)p(x−q(x))p′(x−q(x)) tends to 0 as x tends to +∞. The proposition is true if p′/p≫1 since then ∣p′/p∣ is an (H) function, increasing for x large enough; thus q(x)∣p(x−q(x))∣∣p′(x−q(x))∣≤q(x)∣p(x)∣∣p′(x)∣, and qp′≪p by hypothesis. It is also true if p′/p∼k (k constant =0), for then
p(x−q(x))p′(x−q(x))∼p(x)p′(x)
since x−q(x) tends to +∞. It only remains to examine the case where p′/p≪1. First suppose that p(x) is of finite order relative to x, and so (V, p. 232, prop. 7) p′(x)/p(x)≪1/x. Then one has
p(x−q(x))p′(x−q(x))=x−q(x)1O1(1), so
q(x)p(x−q(x))p′(x−q(x))=xq(x)(1−xq(x))−1O1(1)=xq(x)O2(1), and one sees in this case that the proposition is true subject
only to the hypothesis that
q(x)≪x. Finally we examine the case where
1/x≪p′(x)/p(x)≪1; the function
r=p′/p is then of finite order relative to
x; since, by the preceding remark, prop. 4 of V, p. 255, is applicable to such a function, one has
p′(x−q(x))/p(x−q(x))∼p′(x)/p(x), and the hypothesis
qp′≪p allows us to complete the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.