Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 08H1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08H1].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter V, Appendix 0. Hardy Fields. (H) Functions

Let pp and qq be two (H) functions which are strictly positive on an interval [x0,+∞[[x_0, +\infty[.

1° If q≪p/p′q \ll p/p' one has p(x+q(x))∼p(x)p(x + q(x)) \sim p(x). 2° If both q≪p/p′q \ll p/p' and q(x)≪xq(x) \ll x then p(x−q(x))∼p(x)p(x - q(x)) \sim p(x).

The two parts of this proposition are clear if p∼kp \sim k (constant ≠0\neq 0); one may therefore suppose that p(x)≪1p(x) \ll 1 (otherwise one applies the argument to 1/p1/p). One then deduces p′(x)≪1p'(x) \ll 1.

1° One can write p(x+q(x))=p(x)+q(x)p′(x+θq(x))p(x + q(x)) = p(x) + q(x)p'(x + \theta q(x)) with 0≤θ≤10 \leq \theta \leq 1 (I, p. 14, corollary). Since ∣p′(x)∣|p'(x)| tends to 0 as xx tends to +∞+\infty, and is equal to an (H) function on a neighbourhood of +∞+\infty, it is decreasing on an interval [x1,+∞[[x_1, +\infty[, so, for x≥x1x \geq x_1, one has ∣p′(x+θq(x))∣≤∣p′(x)∣|p'(x + \theta q(x))| \leq |p'(x)|; since qp′≪pqp' \ll p one has p(x+q(x))∼p(x)p(x + q(x)) \sim p(x).

2° The condition q(x)≪xq(x) \ll x ensures that x−q(x)x - q(x) tends to +∞+\infty with xx. Again one has p(x−q(x))=p(x)−q(x)p′(x−θp(x))p(x - q(x)) = p(x) - q(x)p'(x - \theta p(x)) with 0≤θ≤10 \leq \theta \leq 1. The same argument as in the first part of the proof shows that, for xx sufficiently large, ∣p′(x−θq(x))∣≤∣p′(x−q(x))∣|p'(x - \theta q(x))| \leq |p'(x - q(x))|. It reduces to showing that q(x)p′(x−q(x))p(x−q(x))q(x) \frac{p'(x - q(x))}{p(x - q(x))} tends to 0 as xx tends to +∞+\infty. The proposition is true if p′/p≫1p'/p \gg 1 since then ∣p′/p∣|p'/p| is an (H) function, increasing for xx large enough; thus q(x)∣p′(x−q(x))∣∣p(x−q(x))∣≤q(x)∣p′(x)∣∣p(x)∣q(x) \frac{|p'(x - q(x))|}{|p(x - q(x))|} \leq q(x) \frac{|p'(x)|}{|p(x)|}, and qp′≪pqp' \ll p by hypothesis. It is also true if p′/p∼kp'/p \sim k (kk constant ≠0\neq 0), for then

p′(x−q(x))p(x−q(x))∼p′(x)p(x) \frac{p'(x - q(x))}{p(x - q(x))} \sim \frac{p'(x)}{p(x)}

since x−q(x)x - q(x) tends to +∞+\infty. It only remains to examine the case where p′/p≪1p'/p \ll 1. First suppose that p(x)p(x) is of finite order relative to xx, and so (V, p. 232, prop. 7) p′(x)/p(x)≪1/xp'(x)/p(x) \ll 1/x. Then one has

p′(x−q(x))p(x−q(x))=1x−q(x)O1(1), \frac{p'(x-q(x))}{p(x-q(x))} = \frac{1}{x-q(x)} O_1(1),
so
q(x)p′(x−q(x))p(x−q(x))=q(x)x(1−q(x)x)−1O1(1)=q(x)xO2(1), q(x) \frac{p'(x-q(x))}{p(x-q(x))} = \frac{q(x)}{x} \left( 1 - \frac{q(x)}{x} \right)^{-1} O_1(1) = \frac{q(x)}{x} O_2(1),
and one sees in this case that the proposition is true subject only to the hypothesis that q(x)≪xq(x) \ll x. Finally we examine the case where 1/x≪p′(x)/p(x)≪11/x \ll p'(x)/p(x) \ll 1; the function r=p′/pr = p'/p is then of finite order relative to xx; since, by the preceding remark, prop. 4 of V, p. 255, is applicable to such a function, one has p′(x−q(x))/p(x−q(x))∼p′(x)/p(x)p'(x-q(x))/p(x-q(x)) \sim p'(x)/p(x), and the hypothesis qp′≪pqp' \ll p allows us to complete the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.