Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 08HS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08HS].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter VI, § 1. GENERALIZED TAYLOR EXPANSIONS

For an operator U on K[X] to be a composition operator it is necessary and sufficient that it commute with the derivation D on K[X].

Indeed, the Taylor formula shows that for every polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X] one has

UX(f(X+Y))=UX(∑k=0∞1k!YkDkf(X))=∑k=0∞1k!YkU(Dkf(X)); U_X(f(X + Y)) = U_X \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} Y^k D^k f(X) \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} Y^k U(D^k f(X));

if one puts g=U(f)g = U(f) then one has

g(X+Y)=∑k=0∞1k!YkDkg(X)=∑k=0∞1k!YkDk(U(f(X))); g(X + Y) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} Y^k D^k g(X) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} Y^k D^k (U(f(X)));

for U to be a composition operator, one must then have UDk=DkUUD^k = D^k U for every integer k≥1k \geq 1, and in particular UD=DUUD = DU. Conversely, if this relation holds, it implies UDk=DkUUD^k = D^k U for every integer k≥1k \geq 1, by induction on kk; the Taylor formula then shows that g(X+Y)=UX(f(X+Y))g(X + Y) = U_X(f(X + Y)).

For every polynomial f∈K[X,Y]f \in K[X, Y] we denote by U0(f)U_0(f) the term independent of X in the polynomial UX(f)U_X(f); in particular, if f∈K[X]f \in K[X], U0(f)U_0(f) is the constant term in U(f)U(f), and U0U_0 is a linear form on K[X]K[X]. For every polynomial f∈K[X]f \in K[X] let g=U(f)g = U(f); by def. 1 of VI, p. 270

g(X+Y)=UX(f(X+Y))=UX(∑k=0∞1k!XkDkf(Y))=∑k=0∞1k!U(Xk)Dkf(Y) g(X + Y) = U_X(f(X + Y)) = U_X \left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} X^k D^k f(Y) \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} U(X^k) D^k f(Y)

and if, in this formula, one replaces X by 0, one obtains

g(Y)=∑k=0∞1k!U0(Xk)Dkf(Y). g(Y) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} U_0(X^k) D^k f(Y).

Thus one sees that

U(f(X))=∑k=0∞1k!μkDkf(X)(2) U(f(X)) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \mu_k D^k f(X) \tag{2}

where μk\mu_k is the constant term in the polynomial U(Xk)U(X^k).

This formula shows that the μk\mu_k determine the composition operator UU completely; conversely, if (μn)(\mu_n) is an arbitrary sequence of elements of K then the formula (2) defines an operator UU which clearly commutes with D, so (VI, p. 270, prop. 1) is a composition operator. From now on we shall write (2) in the form

U=∑k=0∞1k!μkDk.(3) U = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \mu_k D^k. \tag{3}

This formula can be interpreted in topological language as follows: if one considers the discrete topology on K[X]K[X], and the topology of simple convergence on the algebra End(K[X])\mathrm{End}(K[X]) of endomorphisms of K[X]K[X] (Gen. Top., X, p. 277), the series with general term 1k!μkDk\frac{1}{k!} \mu_k D^k is commutatively convergent in End(K[X])\mathrm{End}(K[X]) and has sum UU (Gen. Top., III, p. 269).

The formula (3) shows that to every formal series u(S)=∑k=0∞αkSku(S) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \alpha_k S^k in one indeterminate over K (Alg., IV. 41) one can associate the composition operator U=∑k=0∞αkDkU = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \alpha_k D^k, which in future we shall denote by u(D)u(D). This remark can be clarified in the following manner:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.