Bourbaki

Proposition 13

Tag 08NF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08NF].

Integration, III, p. 30, § 2. Support of a measure

Let μ\mu be a measure on a locally compact space XX. For a point x0x_0 to belong to Supp(μ)\mathrm{Supp}(\mu), it is necessary and sufficient that the point measure εx0\varepsilon_{x_0} be in the vague closure of the set of measures g⋅μg \cdot \mu, where gg runs over the set of continuous functions with compact support such that ∥g⋅μ∥≤1\| g \cdot \mu \| \leq 1.

The condition is obviously sufficient by virtue of Prop. 6 of No. 2. To see that it is necessary, suppose x0∈Supp(μ)x_0 \in \mathrm{Supp}(\mu); consider a finite number of functions fkf_k (1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n) in K(X;C)\mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}), and an arbitrary number δ>0\delta > 0; we are to prove that there exists a function g∈K(X;C)g \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}) such that ∥g⋅μ∥≤1\| g \cdot \mu \| \leq 1 and such that

∣fk(x0)−μ(gfk)∣≤δ |f_k(x_0) - \mu(g f_k)| \leq \delta
for 1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n. Let UU be a relatively compact open neighborhood of x0x_0 such that the oscillation of each of the fkf_k (1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n) on UU is ≤δ/2\leq \delta / 2. By hypothesis, since x0∈Supp(μ)x_0 \in \mathrm{Supp}(\mu), there exists a function g0∈K(X;C)g_0 \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}) whose support is contained in UU and such that μ(g0)≠0\mu(g_0) \neq 0; the measure ν=g0⋅μ\nu = g_0 \cdot \mu is not zero, since for every function f∈K(X;C)f \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}) equal to 1 on UU, ν(f)=μ(g0)≠0\nu(f) = \mu(g_0) \neq 0. Moreover, ν\nu is bounded (No. 3, Prop. 11);

multiplying g0g_0 by a scalar, we can suppose that ∥ν∥=1\| \nu \| = 1. This being so, setting αk=fk(x0)\alpha_k = f_k(x_0) we can write, for 1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n and for every function h∈K(X;C)h \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}),

fk(x0)−ν(fkh)=αk(1−ν(h))+ν((αk−fk)h). f_k(x_0) - \nu(f_k h) = \alpha_k (1 - \nu(h)) + \nu((\alpha_k - f_k)h) .

Since ν\nu has its support in UU, we may identify it with its restriction to UU; the hypothesis ∥ν∥=1\| \nu \| = 1 then implies that there exists a function h∈K(X;C)h \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}), with support contained in UU, such that ∥h∥≤1\| h \| \leq 1 and such that ∣αk(1−ν(h))∣≤δ/2| \alpha_k (1 - \nu(h)) | \leq \delta / 2 for 1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n. The definition of UU moreover shows that ∣(αk−fk(x))h(x)∣≤δ/2| (\alpha_k - f_k(x)) h(x) | \leq \delta / 2 for all x∈Ux \in U; since ∥ν∥=1\| \nu \| = 1 and Supp⁡(ν)⊂U\operatorname{Supp}(\nu) \subset U we therefore have ∣ν((αk−fk)h)∣≤δ/2| \nu((\alpha_k - f_k)h) | \leq \delta / 2 and so, setting g=g0hg = g_0 h,

∣fk(x0)−μ(gfk)∣≤δfor 1≤k≤n. | f_k(x_0) - \mu(g f_k) | \leq \delta \quad \text{for } 1 \leq k \leq n .

This proves the proposition, since ∥g⋅μ∥=∥(g0h)⋅μ∥≤∥g0⋅μ∥=1\| g \cdot \mu \| = \| (g_0 h) \cdot \mu \| \leq \| g_0 \cdot \mu \| = 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.