Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 08ZX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08ZX].

Integration, chapter V, § 1. Essential upper integral

— Let ff be a positive numerical function defined on TT that is μ\mu-measurable and μ\mu-moderated. Then there exists a sequence (hn)n∈N(h_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of elements of F+(T)\mathscr{F}_+(T), with sum equal to ff, having the following properties:

1) The function h0h_0 is μ\mu-negligible. 2) For every n≥1n \geq 1, there exists a compact set KnK_n such that hnh_n is zero outside KnK_n, and such that the restriction of hnh_n to KnK_n is finite and continuous.

Suppose that ff is the sum of a sequence (fn)(f_n) of positive measurable functions, each of which has the property in the statement; it is clear that ff also has it. Set

fn=inf⁡(f,n+1)−inf⁡(f,n) f_n = \inf(f, n+1) - \inf(f, n)
for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}; since ff is equal to the sum of the sequence (fn)(f_n), it will thus suffice to establish the proposition assuming ff to be moderated and bounded. Denote then by AA the set of t∈Tt \in T such that f(t)>0f(t) > 0; AA is measurable and moderated, therefore there exists a sequence (An)(A_n) of pairwise disjoint integrable sets such that A=⋃nAnA = \bigcup_n A_n. We are reduced to proving the statement for the functions fφAnf \varphi_{A_n}; in other words, we may suppose ff to be bounded and to be zero outside an integrable set II. But II is the union of a negligible set NN and a sequence (Ln)(L_n) of pairwise disjoint compact sets (Ch. IV, §4, No. 6, Cor. 2 of Th. 4). We are thus reduced to treating the case that ff is bounded and is zero outside a compact set LL.

Let K\mathscr{K} be the set of compact subsets KK of TT such that f∣Kf|K is continuous; since K\mathscr{K} is μ\mu-dense (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15), LL is the union of a negligible set NN and a sequence (Kn)n≥1(K_n)_{n \geq 1} of pairwise disjoint elements of K\mathscr{K} (Ch. IV, §5, No. 8, Def. 6). The functions h0=fφNh_0 = f \varphi_N, hn=fφKnh_n = f \varphi_{K_n} for n≥1n \geq 1 then satisfy the conditions of the statement.

The following proposition makes it possible to reduce the study of the upper integral to that of the essential upper integral.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.