Bourbaki

Theorem 3 (Lebesgue)

Tag 093K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 093K].

Integration, chapter V, § 5. Measures defined by numerical densities

— Every complex measure θ\theta on T may be written in one and only one way in the form θ=g⋅μ+θ′\theta = g \cdot \mu + \theta', where gg is locally μ\mu-integrable and θ′\theta' is a measure alien to μ\mu. Then ∣θ∣=∣g∣⋅μ+∣θ′∣|\theta| = |g| \cdot \mu + |\theta'|.

When θ\theta is positive, this follows at once from the theorem of F. Riesz (Ch. II, §1, No. 5, Th. 1) applied to the fully lattice-ordered space M(T)\mathscr{M}(T) of real measures on T, and to the band generated by μ\mu in this space, on taking into account Cor. 2 of No. 5, Th. 2; moreover, θ′\theta' and g⋅μg \cdot \mu are then positive, which implies that gg is positive locally μ\mu-almost everywhere (Cor. 3 of Prop. 3). To treat the case that θ\theta is not positive, set ν=∣θ∣\nu = |\theta|, ν=f⋅μ+ν′\nu = f \cdot \mu + \nu' (where ff is positive and where ν′\nu' and μ\mu are alien to each other), and θ=v⋅ν\theta = v \cdot \nu, where vv is a universally measurable function of absolute value 1 (Cor. 3 of Th. 2). We then have (Prop. 8) θ=g⋅μ+θ′\theta = g \cdot \mu + \theta', with g=vfg = v f (so that ∣g∣=f|g| = f) and θ′=v⋅ν′\theta' = v \cdot \nu' (so that ∣θ′∣=ν′|\theta'| = \nu' by Prop. 2); the measures θ′\theta' and μ\mu are alien to each other by Cor. 2 of Prop. 13. It only remains to establish the uniqueness of the decomposition. Thus, suppose that θ=g⋅μ+θ′=g1⋅μ+θ1′\theta = g \cdot \mu + \theta' = g_1 \cdot \mu + \theta'_1, where θ′\theta' and θ1′\theta'_1 are alien to μ\mu; ∣θ′−θ1′∣|\theta' - \theta'_1| is bounded above by ∣θ′∣+∣θ1′∣|\theta'| + |\theta'_1|, therefore θ′−θ1′\theta' - \theta'_1 is alien to μ\mu, hence also to (g1−g)⋅μ(g_1 - g) \cdot \mu. The relation θ′−θ1′=(g1−g)⋅μ\theta' - \theta'_1 = (g_1 - g) \cdot \mu then implies that the two members are zero, which proves uniqueness.

Recall (No. 5, Th. 2 and Scholium) that the space Lloc1(T,μ;C)L^1_{loc}(T, \mu; \mathbf{C}) may be identified (by means of the mapping g↦g⋅μg \mapsto g \cdot \mu) with a subspace of MC(T)\mathscr{M}_\mathbf{C}(T). With this convention, Theorem 3 takes the following form:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.