Example
Tag 095E, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 095E].
Integration, chapter V, § 6. Images of a measure
— Let and be two locally compact spaces, and let be a local homeomorphism of into . In other words (GT, I, §11, Exer. 25), we assume that every point admits a neighborhood such that is a homeomorphism of onto a neighborhood of ; if necessary replacing by a relatively compact open neighborhood of such that , one deduces that the set of relatively compact open subsets of , such that is a homeomorphism of onto its image, is an open covering of . Now let be a positive measure on ; if is an element of , then is an open set in the compact space , therefore is a locally compact subspace of , and one knows how to define the measure induced by on (Ch. IV, §5, No. 7). Let be the image of under the homeomorphism inverse to ; we are going to show that there exists one and only one measure on that induces the measure on every open set . This measure is called the inverse image of under the local homeomorphism , and is denoted .
The uniqueness of follows at once from the principle of localization (Ch. III, §2, No. 1, Cor. of Prop. 1). To establish existence, we note that if , then every point admits a neighborhood that intersects only at the point , so that is a discrete subspace of , and that the family is summable; we denote its sum by . We next show that the mapping is scalarly essentially -integrable, and that its integral is the sought-for inverse image. This will result at once from the following lemma:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- I, §11 not yet on this site
- III, §2, No. 1
- Cor. of Prop. 1
- IV, §5, No. 7