Bourbaki

Example 4

Tag 09H9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09H9].

Integration, chapter VII, § 3. Applications and examples

— Large triangular group.

Let n1,…,nrn_1, \ldots, n_r be integers ⩾1\geqslant 1. Set pk=n1+…+nk−1p_k = n_1 + \ldots + n_{k-1} and n=pr+1=n1+⋯+nrn = p_{r+1} = n_1 + \cdots + n_r. Let IkI_k be the set of integers jj such that pk<j⩽pk+1p_k < j \leqslant p_{k+1}, and JJ the union of the Ik×IlI_k \times I_l for k<lk < l. Let GG be the closed subgroup of GL(n,K)\mathbf{GL}(n, K) whose elements are the matrices (Zkl)1⩽k⩽r,1⩽l⩽r(Z_{kl})_{1 \leqslant k \leqslant r, 1 \leqslant l \leqslant r} such that: 1) each ZklZ_{kl} is a matrix (zij)i∈Ik,j∈Il(z_{ij})_{i \in I_k, j \in I_l} of elements of KK, with nkn_k rows and nln_l columns; 2) Zkl=0Z_{kl} = 0 for k>lk > l; 3) Zkk∈GL(nk,K)Z_{kk} \in \mathbf{GL}(n_k, K) for 1⩽k⩽r1 \leqslant k \leqslant r.

The formula for block multiplication

(Z110…00Z22…0⋮⋮⋱⋮00…Zrr)(1Z12…Z1r01…Z2r⋮⋮⋱⋮00…1) \begin{pmatrix} Z_{11} & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & Z_{22} & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & Z_{rr} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & Z_{12} & \ldots & Z_{1r} \\ 0 & 1 & \ldots & Z_{2r} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & 1 \end{pmatrix}
=(Z11Z11Z12…Z11Z1r0Z22…Z22Z2r⋮⋮⋱⋮00…Zrr) = \begin{pmatrix} Z_{11} & Z_{11}Z_{12} & \ldots & Z_{11}Z_{1r} \\ 0 & Z_{22} & \ldots & Z_{22}Z_{2r} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & Z_{rr} \end{pmatrix}

shows that GG is the topological semi-direct product of the subgroup DD of elements (Zkl)∈G(Z_{kl}) \in G such that Zkl=0Z_{kl} = 0 for k≠lk \neq l and the subgroup TJT_J of Example 3. Moreover, DD is isomorphic to the direct product of the groups GL(nk,K)\mathbf{GL}(n_k, K) for 1⩽k⩽r1 \leqslant k \leqslant r.

Let J′J' be the set of pairs (j,i)(j, i) for (i,j)∈J(i, j) \in J and let HH be the set of pairs (i,j)∈[1,n]×[1,n](i, j) \in [1, n] \times [1, n] not belonging to J′J'. Let Z′=(zij)1⩽i⩽n,1⩽j⩽nZ' = (z_{ij})_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant n, 1 \leqslant j \leqslant n} be an element of GG. By Prop. 14 of §2, No. 9 and the above Examples 1 and 3, one obtains a left Haar measure on GG by taking the image of the measure

⨂k=1r((mod det⁡Zkk)−nk⋅⨂i,j∈Ikdzij)⊗(⨂(i,j)∈Jdzij) \bigotimes_{k=1}^r ((\mathrm{mod}\ \det Z_{kk})^{-n_k} \cdot \bigotimes_{i,j \in I_k} dz_{ij}) \otimes \left( \bigotimes_{(i,j) \in J} dz_{ij} \right)

under the mapping

((Zkk),(Zkl))↦(Z11Z11Z12…Z11Z1r0Z22…Z22Z2r⋮⋮⋱⋮00…Zrr). ((Z_{kk}), (Z_{kl})) \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} Z_{11} & Z_{11}Z_{12} & \ldots & Z_{11}Z_{1r} \\ 0 & Z_{22} & \ldots & Z_{22}Z_{2r} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & Z_{rr} \end{pmatrix}.

Now, consider, for k<lk < l, the vector space of matrices Zkl=(zij)i∈Ik,j∈IlZ_{kl} = (z_{ij})_{i \in I_k, j \in I_l}. It is the direct sum of the nln_l subspaces MjM_j (j∈Ilj \in I_l) formed by the matrices such that zih=0z_{ih} = 0 for h≠jh \neq j. Each of these subspaces MjM_j is stable under the mapping Zkl↦ZkkZklZ_{kl} \mapsto Z_{kk}Z_{kl}, and the restriction of this mapping to MjM_j has matrix ZkkZ_{kk}. Consequently (§ 1, No. 10, Prop. 15) the image of the measure ⨂i∈Ik,j∈Ildzij\bigotimes_{i \in I_k, j \in I_l} dz_{ij} under the mapping Zkl↦ZkkZklZ_{kl} \mapsto Z_{kk}Z_{kl} is

(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)−nl⋅⨂i∈Ik,j∈Ildzij. (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{-n_l} \cdot \bigotimes_{i \in I_k, j \in I_l} dz_{ij}.

A left Haar measure on GG is therefore given by

∏k=1r(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)−qk⋅⨂(i,j)∈Hdzij \prod_{k=1}^r (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{-q_k} \cdot \bigotimes_{(i,j) \in H} dz_{ij}

with qk=∑k≤l≤rnl=n−pkq_k = \sum_{k \leq l \leq r} n_l = n - p_k.

Let us calculate the modulus of GG, again using Prop. 14 of § 2. The groups DD and TJT_J are unimodular; on the other hand:

(Z110…00Z22…0⋮⋮⋱⋮00…Zrr)(1Z12…Z1r01…Z2r⋮⋮⋱⋮00…1)(Z110…00Z22…0⋮⋮⋱⋮00…Zrr)−1 \begin{pmatrix} Z_{11} & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & Z_{22} & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & Z_{rr} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & Z_{12} & \ldots & Z_{1r} \\ 0 & 1 & \ldots & Z_{2r} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} Z_{11} & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & Z_{22} & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & Z_{rr} \end{pmatrix}^{-1}
=(1Z12′…Z1r′01…Z2r′⋮⋮⋱⋮00…1), = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & Z'_{12} & \ldots & Z'_{1r} \\ 0 & 1 & \ldots & Z'_{2r} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \ldots & 1 \end{pmatrix},

where Zkl′=ZkkZklZll−1Z'_{kl} = Z_{kk}Z_{kl}Z_{ll}^{-1}. Taking into account Example 3, and Prop. 15 of § 1, No. 10, and arguing as above, one sees that if X=diag⁡(Z11,…,Zrr)∈DX = \operatorname{diag}(Z_{11}, \ldots, Z_{rr}) \in D then the modulus of the automorphism Z↦X−1ZXZ \mapsto X^{-1}ZX of TJT_J is

∏k<l(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)−nl(mod⁡det⁡Zll)nk, \prod_{k < l} (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{-n_l} (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{ll})^{n_k},

therefore

ΔG(Z)=∏k=1r(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)n+nk−2qk. \Delta_G(Z) = \prod_{k=1}^r (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{n+n_k-2q_k}.

The transposed group G′G' of GG is studied in the same manner. For G′G', one finds as left Haar measure

∏k=1r(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)−pk+1⋅⨂(j,i)∈Hdzij, \prod_{k=1}^r (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{-p_{k+1}} \cdot \bigotimes_{(j,i) \in H} dz_{ij},

and as modulus

∏k=1r(mod⁡det⁡Zkk)n+nk−2pk+1. \prod_{k=1}^r (\operatorname{mod} \det Z_{kk})^{n+n_k-2p_{k+1}}.

If in particular one takes n1=…=nr=1n_1 = \ldots = n_r = 1, one finds as group GG the group T(n,K)∗T(n, K)^* of invertible elements of the subalgebra of Mn(K)M_n(K) formed by the matrices X=(xij)X = (x_{ij}) such that xij=0x_{ij} = 0 for i>ji > j. This algebra, which we shall denote T(n,K)T(n, K), is called the upper triangular algebra, and the group T(n,K)∗T(n, K)^* is called the upper large triangular group of order nn over KK. The preceding formulas then take the following form: a left Haar measure on T(n,K)∗T(n, K)^* is

(9 bis)(9\ bis)
∏i=1n(mod⁡zii)i−n−1⋅⨂i≤jdzij(Z=(zij)) \prod_{i=1}^n (\operatorname{mod} z_{ii})^{i-n-1} \cdot \bigotimes_{i \leq j} dz_{ij} \quad (Z = (z_{ij}))

and the modulus of T(n,K)∗T(n, K)^* is

(10 bis)(10\ bis)
ΔT(n,K)∗(Z)=∏i=1n(mod⁡zii)2i−n−1(Z=(zij)). \Delta_{T(n,K)^*}(Z) = \prod_{i=1}^n (\operatorname{mod} z_{ii})^{2i-n-1} \quad (Z = (z_{ij})).

For the transpose of T(n,K)∗T(n, K)^*, or lower large triangular group, one finds as left Haar measure

∏i=1n(mod⁡zii)−i⋅⨂i≥jdzij, \prod_{i=1}^n (\operatorname{mod} z_{ii})^{-i} \cdot \bigotimes_{i \geq j} dz_{ij},

and as modulus

∏i=1n(mod⁡zii)n+1−2i. \prod_{i=1}^n (\operatorname{mod} z_{ii})^{n+1-2i}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.