— a) Let U=(uij)∈GL(n,K). In order that U∈Ω, it is necessary and sufficient that det(uij)k≤i,j≤n=0 for k=2,3,…,n. b) Ω is an open subset of GL(n,K). c) The mapping φ is a homeomorphism of T1(n,K)×t(T(n,K)∗) onto Ω.
In order that U∈Ω, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a Z=(zij)∈T1(n,K) such that ZU∈t(T(n,K)) (then necessarily
ZU∈t(T(n,K)∗) since U and Z are invertible). By what we saw earlier, if Z exists then it is unique. Thus, in order that U∈Ω, it is necessary and sufficient that the linear system
k=1∑nzikukj=0(1≤i<j≤n)
(where (zij)∈T1(n,K)) admit a unique solution. Now, this system may be written
(13)k=i+1∑nzikukj=−uij(1≤i<j≤n).
For fixed i, one has a system of n−i equations in the unknowns zi,i+1,zi,i+2,…,zi,n; for these systems to admit unique solutions, it is necessary and sufficient that
det(ukj)i+1≤k≤n, i+1≤j≤n=0
for i=1,2,…,n−1. This proves a). From this it follows that Ω is open in GL(n,K). On the other hand, on solving the system (13) by means of Cramer’s formulas, the zij are obtained as rational functions of the uij with nonzero denominators in Ω, therefore Z depends continuously on U in Ω, which proves c).
Now let G1′⊂t(T(n,K)∗) be the lower special triangular group. The mapping (M,N)↦M⋅N is a continuous bijection ψ of T1(n,K)×G1′ onto a subset Ω′ of SL(n,K).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.