Bourbaki

Lemma 7

Tag 09HD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09HD].

Integration, chapter VII, § 3. Applications and examples

— a) Let U=(uij)∈GL(n,K)U = (u_{ij}) \in \mathbf{GL}(n, K). In order that U∈ΩU \in \Omega, it is necessary and sufficient that det⁡(uij)k≤i,j≤n≠0\det(u_{ij})_{k \leq i, j \leq n} \neq 0 for k=2,3,…,nk = 2, 3, \ldots, n. b) Ω\Omega is an open subset of GL(n,K)\mathbf{GL}(n, K). c) The mapping φ\varphi is a homeomorphism of T1(n,K)×t(T(n,K)∗)T_1(n, K) \times {}^t(T(n, K)^*) onto Ω\Omega.

In order that U∈ΩU \in \Omega, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a Z=(zij)∈T1(n,K)Z = (z_{ij}) \in T_1(n, K) such that ZU∈t(T(n,K))ZU \in {}^t(T(n, K)) (then necessarily

ZU∈t(T(n,K)∗)ZU \in {}^t(T(n, K)^*) since UU and ZZ are invertible). By what we saw earlier, if ZZ exists then it is unique. Thus, in order that U∈ΩU \in \Omega, it is necessary and sufficient that the linear system

∑k=1nzikukj=0(1≤i<j≤n) \sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik} u_{kj} = 0 \qquad (1 \leq i < j \leq n)

(where (zij)∈T1(n,K)(z_{ij}) \in T_1(n, K)) admit a unique solution. Now, this system may be written

(13)∑k=i+1nzikukj=−uij(1≤i<j≤n). (13) \qquad \sum_{k=i+1}^n z_{ik} u_{kj} = -u_{ij} \qquad (1 \leq i < j \leq n).

For fixed ii, one has a system of n−in-i equations in the unknowns zi,i+1,zi,i+2,…,zi,nz_{i,i+1}, z_{i,i+2}, \ldots, z_{i,n}; for these systems to admit unique solutions, it is necessary and sufficient that

det⁡(ukj)i+1≤k≤n, i+1≤j≤n≠0 \det(u_{kj})_{i+1 \leq k \leq n,\ i+1 \leq j \leq n} \neq 0

for i=1,2,…,n−1i = 1, 2, \ldots, n-1. This proves a). From this it follows that Ω\Omega is open in GL(n,K)\mathbf{GL}(n, K). On the other hand, on solving the system (13) by means of Cramer’s formulas, the zijz_{ij} are obtained as rational functions of the uiju_{ij} with nonzero denominators in Ω\Omega, therefore ZZ depends continuously on UU in Ω\Omega, which proves c).

Now let G1′⊂t(T(n,K)∗)G'_1 \subset {}^t(T(n, K)^*) be the lower special triangular group. The mapping (M,N)↦M⋅N(M, N) \mapsto M \cdot N is a continuous bijection ψ\psi of T1(n,K)×G1′T_1(n, K) \times G'_1 onto a subset Ω′\Omega' of SL(n,K)\mathbf{SL}(n, K).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.