Bourbaki

Example

Tag 09I1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09I1].

Integration, chapter VIII, § 1. Convolution

— 1) For any φ\varphi, the measures εxi\varepsilon_{x_i}, where xi∈Xix_i \in X_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n, are always convolvable and have convolution product εy\varepsilon_y, with y=φ(x1,x2,…,xn)y = \varphi(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n). Consequently, if each of the μi\mu_i has finite support, then the μi\mu_i are convolvable and μ1∗⋯∗μn\mu_1 * \cdots * \mu_n has finite support. In particular, let MM be a monoid1^1 equipped with a locally compact topology; if one takes φ\varphi to be the law of composition in MM then the measures on MM with finite support form, for convolution, an algebra that is none other than the algebra of the monoid MM (over R\mathbf{R} or over C\mathbf{C}, according as one considers real or complex measures) (A, III, §2, No. 6).

2) Let MM be a monoid equipped with the discrete topology; assume that for each m∈Mm \in M, there are only finitely many pairs (m′,m′′)∈M×M(m', m'') \in M \times M such that m′m′′=mm'm'' = m; this amounts to saying that the law of composition in MM is a proper mapping of M×MM \times M into MM; the measures on MM then form an algebra for convolution, an algebra that is none other than the total

(1) Monoïde, in the sense of Exer. 17 of Ch. VII, §1.

algebra of the monoid MM (A, III, §2, No. 10); we note the following two special cases:

a) M=NM = N, the law of composition being addition. To every measure μ\mu on NN, let us associate the formal series

S(μ)=∑n=0∞μ({n})tn S(\mu) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \mu(\{n\}) t^n

in an indeterminate tt. Then S(μ∗μ′)=S(μ)S(μ′)S(\mu * \mu') = S(\mu)S(\mu'). An analogous remark holds for formal series in any number of indeterminates.

∗b)*b) M=N∗M = N^*, the law of composition being multiplication. To every measure μ\mu on N∗N^*, let us associate the formal Dirichlet series

D(μ)=∑n=1∞μ({n})n−s. D(\mu) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mu(\{n\}) n^{-s}.

Then D(μ∗μ′)=D(μ)D(μ′)D(\mu * \mu') = D(\mu)D(\mu').

3) Let X,Y,ZX, Y, Z be locally compact spaces, φ\varphi a continuous mapping of X×YX \times Y into ZZ. If x∈Xx \in X and μ\mu is a measure on YY, to say that εx\varepsilon_x and μ\mu are φ\varphi-convolvable comes to saying that the mapping φ(x,⋅)\varphi(x, \cdot) of YY into ZZ is μ\mu-proper. One then has εx∗μ=φ(x,⋅)(μ)\varepsilon_x * \mu = \varphi(x, \cdot)(\mu).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.