Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 09IO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09IO].

Integration, VIII, p. 10, § 2. Linear representations of groups

Let X be a locally compact space, Y and Z topological spaces, φ\varphi a continuous mapping of X×YX \times Y into Z, and φx\varphi_x the mapping y↦φ(x,y)y \mapsto \varphi(x,y) of Y into Z. The spaces C(Y),C(Z)\mathscr{C}(Y), \mathscr{C}(Z) being equipped with the topology of compact convergence, the mapping (x,f)↦f∘φx(x,f) \mapsto f \circ \varphi_x of X×C(Z)X \times \mathscr{C}(Z) into C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y) is continuous.

It clearly suffices to consider the case that X is compact. Let (x0,f0)∈X×C(Z)(x_0, f_0) \in X \times \mathscr{C}(Z), K a compact subset of Y, and ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Let K′=φ(X×K)K' = \varphi(X \times K). Since f0∘φf_0 \circ \varphi is uniformly continuous in X×KX \times K, there exists a neighborhood W of x0x_0 such that ∣f0(φ(x,y))−f0(φ(x0,y))∣≤ε|f_0(\varphi(x,y)) - f_0(\varphi(x_0,y))| \leq \varepsilon for x∈Wx \in W and y∈Ky \in K. On the other hand, if one takes f∈C(Z)f \in \mathscr{C}(Z) to be such that ∣f(z)−f0(z)∣≤ε|f(z) - f_0(z)| \leq \varepsilon for all z∈K′z \in K', one will have ∣f(φ(x,y))−f0(φ(x,y))∣≤ε|f(\varphi(x,y)) - f_0(\varphi(x,y))| \leq \varepsilon for x∈X,y∈Kx \in X, y \in K, and therefore ∣f(φ(x,y))−f0(φ(x0,y))∣≤2ε|f(\varphi(x,y)) - f_0(\varphi(x_0,y))| \leq 2\varepsilon for x∈W,y∈Kx \in W, y \in K. Whence the lemma.

Let us now return to the earlier notations.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.