Bourbaki

Remark 1

Tag 09KB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09KB].

Integration, chapter VIII, § 4. Convolution of measures and functions

— Under the hypotheses of Prop. 4, the mapping μ↦μ∗βf\mu \mapsto \mu *^\beta f of M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G) into C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) is continuous when M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G) is equipped with the vague topology, for every f∈K(X)f \in \mathscr{K}(X). For, let KK be a compact subset of XX, SS the (compact) support of ff; since GG operates properly in XX, the set of s∈Gs \in G for which there exists an x∈Kx \in K with s−1x∈Ss^{-1}x \in S is a compact subset LL of GG (GT, III, § 4, No. 5, Th. 1). Let ε\varepsilon be a number >0> 0, φ\varphi a function in K+(G)\mathscr{K}_+(G) equal to 1 on the compact set LL, μ0\mu_0 an element of M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G); the set W0W_0 of measures μ∈M+(G)\mu \in \mathscr{M}_+(G) such that

∣∫φ(s) dμ(s)−∫φ(s) dμ0(s)∣≤ε \left| \int \varphi(s)\, d\mu(s) - \int \varphi(s)\, d\mu_0(s) \right| \leq \varepsilon
is a neighborhood of μ0\mu_0 in M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G). On the other hand, the function (s,x)↦f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)(s, x) \mapsto f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x) is uniformly continuous on L×KL \times K, therefore there exists a finite number of points xi∈Kx_i \in K (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) such that for every x∈Kx \in K, there is an ii for which
∣f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)−f(s−1xi)χ(s−1,xi)∣≤ε |f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x) - f(s^{-1}x_i)\chi(s^{-1}, x_i)| \leq \varepsilon
for all s∈Ls \in L. Since μ(L)≤∫φ(s) dμ0(s)+ε\mu(L) \leq \int \varphi(s)\, d\mu_0(s) + \varepsilon for all μ∈W0\mu \in W_0, also
∣∫f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x) dμ(s)−∫f(s−1xi)χ(s−1,xi) dμ(s)∣≤ε(∫φ(s) dμ0(s)+ε) \begin{align*} \left| \int f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x)\, d\mu(s) - \int f(s^{-1}x_i)\chi(s^{-1}, x_i)\, d\mu(s) \right| \\ \leq \varepsilon \left( \int \varphi(s)\, d\mu_0(s) + \varepsilon \right) \end{align*}
for every xx satisfying the preceding inequality and every μ∈W0\mu \in W_0. Now let WW be the neighborhood of μ0\mu_0 in M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G) formed by the measures μ∈W0\mu \in W_0 such that
∣∫f(s−1xi)χ(s−1,xi) dμ(s)−∫f(s−1xi)χ(s−1,xi) dμ0(s)∣≤ε \left| \int f(s^{-1}x_i)\chi(s^{-1}, x_i)\, d\mu(s) - \int f(s^{-1}x_i)\chi(s^{-1}, x_i)\, d\mu_0(s) \right| \leq \varepsilon
for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n. It is clear that for every measure μ∈W\mu \in W and every x∈Kx \in K,
∣∫f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x) dμ(s)−∫f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x) dμ0(s)∣≤ε(2∫φ(s) dμ0(s)+2ε+1), \begin{align*} \left| \int f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x)\, d\mu(s) - \int f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x)\, d\mu_0(s) \right| \\ \leq \varepsilon \left( 2 \int \varphi(s)\, d\mu_0(s) + 2\varepsilon + 1 \right), \end{align*}
and since ε\varepsilon is arbitrary, this proves our assertion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.