Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 09M5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09M5].

Integration, chapter VIII, § 5. The space of closed subgroups

Let g be a μ\mu-integrable positive numerical function and let Γ0(g)\Gamma^0(g) be the set of measures α∈Γ0\alpha \in \Gamma^0 such that ∫∗g(xs) dα(s)≥1\int^* g(xs)\, d\alpha(s) \geq 1 for all x∈Gx \in G. Then the mapping α↦∥μα∥\alpha \mapsto \|\mu_\alpha\| of Γ0(g)\Gamma^0(g) into R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}} is vaguely continuous.

For every measure α∈Γ0(G)\alpha \in \Gamma^0(G), recall (Ch. VII, §2, No. 3, Prop. 5) that the function

gα(x˙)=∫Hαg(xs) dα(s) g_\alpha(\dot{x}) = \int_{H_\alpha} g(xs)\, d\alpha(s)

is defined μα\mu_\alpha-almost everywhere on QαQ_\alpha, is μα\mu_\alpha-integrable, and

∫Gg(x) dμ(x)=∫Qαgα(x˙) dμα(x˙). \int_G g(x)\, d\mu(x) = \int_{Q_\alpha} g_\alpha(\dot{x})\, d\mu_\alpha(\dot{x}) .

In view of Prop. 4, it suffices to prove that, in Γ0(g)\Gamma^0(g), α↦∥μα∥\alpha \mapsto \|\mu_\alpha\| is upper semi-continuous. Fix a measure α∈Γ0(g)\alpha \in \Gamma^0(g), and let K be a compact subset of G. There exists on QαQ_\alpha a continuous function with compact support, taking its values in [0,1][0, 1], equal to 1 on the compact set πα(K)\pi_\alpha(K); since the mapping f↦fαf \mapsto f_\alpha of H+(G)\mathscr{H}_+(G) into H+(Qα)\mathscr{H}_+(Q_\alpha) is surjective (Ch. VII, §2, No. 1, Prop. 2), one sees that there exists a function f∈H+(G)f \in \mathscr{H}_+(G) such that

(f∗α)(x)=∫Gf(xs) dα(s){≤1for all x∈G=1for all x∈K. (f * \alpha)(x) = \int_G f(xs)\, d\alpha(s) \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \leq 1 & \text{for all } x \in G \\ = 1 & \text{for all } x \in K . \end{array} \right.

Since β↦f∗β\beta \mapsto f * \beta is a continuous mapping of M+(G)\mathscr{M}_+(G), equipped with the vague topology, into C(G)\mathscr{C}(G) equipped with the topology of compact convergence (§ 4, No. 2, Remark 1), one sees that for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the set UεU_\varepsilon of β∈Γ0(G)\beta \in \Gamma^0(G) such that

fβ(x˙)=∫Gf(xs) dβ(s)>1−εfor all x∈K f_\beta(\dot{x}) = \int_G f(xs)\, d\beta(s) > 1 - \varepsilon \quad \text{for all } x \in K
is an open neighborhood of α\alpha in Γ0(g)\Gamma^0(g); for every β∈Uε\beta \in U_\varepsilon, we then have, by virtue of the formula (2),
(5)∥μα∥≥∫Gf(x) dμ(x)=∫Qβfβ(x˙) dμβ(x˙)≥(1−ε)μβ(πβ(K)). (5) \quad \| \mu_\alpha \| \geq \int_G f(x)\, d\mu(x) = \int_{Q_\beta} f_\beta(\dot{x})\, d\mu_\beta(\dot{x}) \geq (1 - \varepsilon) \mu_\beta(\pi_\beta(K)).
Given a number ε>0\varepsilon > 0, let us choose a function h∈K+(G)h \in \mathscr{K}_+(G) such that ∫G∣g(x)−h(x)∣ dμ(x)≤ε\int_G |g(x) - h(x)|\, d\mu(x) \leq \varepsilon, and let us take K=Supp(h)K = \mathrm{Supp}(h) in the foregoing. For every β∈Γ0(g)\beta \in \Gamma^0(g), by hypothesis gβ(x˙)≥1g_\beta(\dot{x}) \geq 1 almost everywhere (for μβ\mu_\beta) in QβQ_\beta, therefore
μβ(Qβ−πβ(K))≤∫Qβ−πβ(K)gβ(x˙) dμβ(x˙)=∫G−KHβg(x) dμ(x) \mu_\beta(Q_\beta - \pi_\beta(K)) \leq \int_{Q_\beta - \pi_\beta(K)} g_\beta(\dot{x})\, d\mu_\beta(\dot{x}) = \int_{G - KH_\beta} g(x)\, d\mu(x)
by virtue of (4); since hh is zero outside KK, and afortioria fortiori outside KHβKH_\beta, it follows that
μβ(Qβ−πβ(K))≤∫G−KHβ∣g(x)−h(x)∣ dμ(x)≤∫G∣g(x)−h(x)∣ dμ(x)≤ε; \mu_\beta(Q_\beta - \pi_\beta(K)) \leq \int_{G - KH_\beta} |g(x) - h(x)|\, d\mu(x) \\ \leq \int_G |g(x) - h(x)|\, d\mu(x) \leq \varepsilon;
combining this result with (5), one sees that
∥μβ∥≤ε+∥μα∥/(1−ε) \| \mu_\beta \| \leq \varepsilon + \| \mu_\alpha \|/(1 - \varepsilon)
when β∈Uε\beta \in U_\varepsilon, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.