Let g be a μ-integrable positive numerical function and let Γ0(g) be the set of measures α∈Γ0 such that ∫∗g(xs)dα(s)≥1 for all x∈G. Then the mapping α↦∥μα∥ of Γ0(g) into R is vaguely continuous.
For every measure α∈Γ0(G), recall (Ch. VII, §2, No. 3, Prop. 5) that the function
gα(x˙)=∫Hαg(xs)dα(s)
is defined μα-almost everywhere on Qα, is μα-integrable, and
∫Gg(x)dμ(x)=∫Qαgα(x˙)dμα(x˙).
In view of Prop. 4, it suffices to prove that, in Γ0(g), α↦∥μα∥ is upper semi-continuous. Fix a measure α∈Γ0(g), and let K be a compact subset of G. There exists on Qα a continuous function with compact support, taking its values in [0,1], equal to 1 on the compact set πα(K); since the mapping f↦fα of H+(G) into H+(Qα) is surjective (Ch. VII, §2, No. 1, Prop. 2), one sees that there exists a function f∈H+(G) such that
(f∗α)(x)=∫Gf(xs)dα(s){≤1=1for all x∈Gfor all x∈K.
Since β↦f∗β is a continuous mapping of M+(G), equipped with the vague topology, into C(G) equipped with the topology of compact convergence (§ 4, No. 2, Remark 1), one sees that for every ε>0, the set Uε of β∈Γ0(G) such that
fβ(x˙)=∫Gf(xs)dβ(s)>1−εfor all x∈K is an open neighborhood of
α in
Γ0(g); for every
β∈Uε, we then have, by virtue of the formula (2),
(5)∥μα∥≥∫Gf(x)dμ(x)=∫Qβfβ(x˙)dμβ(x˙)≥(1−ε)μβ(πβ(K)). Given a number
ε>0, let us choose a function
h∈K+(G) such that
∫G∣g(x)−h(x)∣dμ(x)≤ε, and let us take
K=Supp(h) in the foregoing. For every
β∈Γ0(g), by hypothesis
gβ(x˙)≥1 almost everywhere (for
μβ) in
Qβ, therefore
μβ(Qβ−πβ(K))≤∫Qβ−πβ(K)gβ(x˙)dμβ(x˙)=∫G−KHβg(x)dμ(x) by virtue of (4); since
h is zero outside
K, and
afortiori outside
KHβ, it follows that
μβ(Qβ−πβ(K))≤∫G−KHβ∣g(x)−h(x)∣dμ(x)≤∫G∣g(x)−h(x)∣dμ(x)≤ε; combining this result with (5), one sees that
∥μβ∥≤ε+∥μα∥/(1−ε) when
β∈Uε, which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.