Remark 2
Tag 09OI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09OI].
Integration, IX, p. 23, § 2. Operations on measures
Def. 1 may be extended to the case that is a complex measure on . To show in this case that the premeasure is a measure, it suffices to observe that for every compact subset of (§1, No. 2).
By Prop. 1, a subset of is -measurable (resp. locally -negligible) if and only if it is -measurable (resp. locally -negligible). If is -measurable, hence -measurable, the induced measures and are obviously equal by virtue of Prop. 1 (transitivity of induced measures).
Remark 3). — Let X be a -measurable subset of T. By Prop. 10 of §1, No. 8, applied to , there exists a crushing of T such that for each , either or . If one modifies the topology of T by the procedure of the Scholium of §1, No. 8, the space obtained by equipping X with the topology induced by is locally compact, and one knows how to associate to (resp. to ) a measure (resp. ) on (resp. on ) that admits the same essential upper integral as (resp. ): this implies that . Since the locally negligible sets, measurable mappings, and essentially integrable functions with values in a Banach space, are the same for and , and for and , the theory of integration with respect to an induced measure reduces to that which was treated in Ch. V, §7 in the special case of locally compact spaces. We leave to the reader the task of transcribing the results.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.