Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 09QN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09QN].

Integration, chapter IX, § 4. Inverse limits of measures

— Let there be given an inverse system (Ti,pij)(T_i, p_{ij}) of topological spaces indexed by I, a topological space T, and a coherent and separating family of continuous mappings pi:T→Tip_i : T \to T_i. Then:

a) For every compact subset K of T, one has K=⋂i∈Ipi−1(pi(K))K = \bigcap_{i \in I} p_i^{-1}(p_i(K)).

b) Let K and L be two disjoint compact subsets of T. There exists an i∈Ii \in I such that pj(K)p_j(K) and pj(L)p_j(L) are disjoint for j≥ij \geq i.

a) Let x be a point of ⋂i∈Ipi−1(pi(K))\bigcap_{i \in I} p_i^{-1}(p_i(K)); for every i∈Ii \in I, the set KiK_i of points y in K such that pi(y)=pi(x)p_i(y) = p_i(x) is a nonempty closed subset of K. For i≤ji \leq j we have Ki⊃KjK_i \supset K_j, and, since K is compact, the set ⋂i∈IKi\bigcap_{i \in I} K_i is therefore nonempty. Let y be a point of ⋂i∈IKi\bigcap_{i \in I} K_i; we have y∈Ky \in K and pi(y)=pi(x)p_i(y) = p_i(x) for all i∈Ii \in I, whence y=xy = x; finally, x∈Kx \in K, which proves the inclusion K⊃⋂i∈Ipi−1(pi(K))K \supset \bigcap_{i \in I} p_i^{-1}(p_i(K)); the reverse inclusion is obvious.

b) For every i∈Ii \in I, set Mi=pi−1(pi(K))∩LM_i = p_i^{-1}(p_i(K)) \cap L; this is a closed subset of the compact space L, we have Mi⊃MjM_i \supset M_j for i≤ji \leq j, and, by a),

⋂i∈IMi=K∩L=∅. \bigcap_{i \in I} M_i = K \cap L = \varnothing.

Consequently, there exists an index i such that Mi=∅M_i = \varnothing. For j≥ij \geq i, we have pj−1(pj(K))∩L=Mj⊂Mi=∅p_j^{-1}(p_j(K)) \cap L = M_j \subset M_i = \varnothing, whence pj(K)∩pj(L)=∅p_j(K) \cap p_j(L) = \varnothing.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.