Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 09RA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09RA].

Integration, chapter IX, § 5. Measures on completely regular spaces

— Let X be a completely regular space, T a subspace of X, and i the canonical injection of T into X. Denote by W the set of bounded positive measures on X that are concentrated on T, equipped with the topology induced by Mb(X)\mathscr{M}^b(X). Then the mapping μ↦i(μ)\mu \mapsto i(\mu) of M+b(T)\mathscr{M}_+^b(T) into Mb(X)\mathscr{M}^b(X) is a homeomorphism of M+b(T)\mathscr{M}_+^b(T) onto W.

We denote again by i the mapping μ↦i(μ)\mu \mapsto i(\mu) of M+b(T)\mathscr{M}_+^b(T) into M+b(X)\mathscr{M}_+^b(X); i is injective (§2, No. 4, Prop. 8) and maps M+b(T)\mathscr{M}_+^b(T) into W (§2, No. 3, Prop. 7). If λ∈W\lambda \in W, then λ=i(λT)\lambda = i(\lambda_T) (§2, No. 3, Prop. 7 b)). Consequently, i is a bijection of M+b(T)\mathscr{M}_+^b(T) onto W, and the inverse bijection of i is the mapping r:λ↦λTr : \lambda \mapsto \lambda_T on WW. On the other hand, ii is continuous: for, if f∈Cb(X)f \in \mathscr{C}^b(X), then ⟨i(μ),f⟩=⟨μ,f∘i⟩\langle i(\mu), f \rangle = \langle \mu, f \circ i \rangle, and f∘if \circ i belongs to Cb(T)\mathscr{C}^b(T). Thus, everything comes down to showing that, for every measure μ∈W\mu \in W and every function f∈C+b(T)f \in \mathscr{C}^b_+(T), one has

lim⁡λ→μ,λ∈WλT(f)=μT(f), \lim_{\lambda \to \mu, \lambda \in W} \lambda_T(f) = \mu_T(f),

or again

lim⁡λ→μ,λ∈Wλ(f0)=μ(f0). \lim_{\lambda \to \mu, \lambda \in W} \lambda(f^0) = \mu(f^0).

Let f∞f^\infty be the function on XX that coincides with ff on TT and with +∞+\infty on X−TX - T, and let f′f' and f′′f'' be, respectively, the upper semi-continuous regularization of f0f^0 and the lower semi-continuous regularization of f∞f^\infty (GT, IV, §6, No. 2). The relations

f′(x)=lim sup⁡y→xf0(y),f′′(x)=lim inf⁡y→xf∞(y) f'(x) = \limsup_{y \to x} f^0(y), \quad f''(x) = \liminf_{y \to x} f^\infty(y)

immediately imply that f′f' and f′′f'' both coincide with ff and f0f^0 on TT. Prop. 6 then yields

μ∙(f′)≥lim sup⁡λ→μ,λ∈Wλ∙(f′),μ∙(f′′)≤lim inf⁡λ→μ,λ∈Wλ∙(f′′). \mu^\bullet(f') \geq \limsup_{\lambda \to \mu, \lambda \in W} \lambda^\bullet(f'), \quad \mu^\bullet(f'') \leq \liminf_{\lambda \to \mu, \lambda \in W} \lambda^\bullet(f'').

But one can replace f′f' and f′′f'' by f0f^0 in these two formulas, since the measures λ\lambda and μ\mu are carried by TT; we have thus obtained the desired relation.

The statement of Prop. 8 is only valid for positive measures: the mapping μ↦i(μ)\mu \mapsto i(\mu) of Mb(T)\mathscr{M}^b(T) into Mb(X)\mathscr{M}^b(X) is injective and continuous, but is not in general a homeomorphism of Mb(T)\mathscr{M}^b(T) onto its image. For example, take X=RX = \mathbf{R}, T=R−{0}T = \mathbf{R} - \{0\}; the measures λt=εt−ε−t\lambda_t = \varepsilon_t - \varepsilon_{-t} (t>0t > 0) converge tightly to 0 in XX as tt tends to 0, but do not converge tightly to 0 in TT (the characteristic function of ]0,+∞[]0, +\infty[ belongs to Cb(T)\mathscr{C}^b(T)) (cf. however the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 5).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.