Proposition 8
Tag 09RA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09RA].
Integration, chapter IX, § 5. Measures on completely regular spaces
— Let X be a completely regular space, T a subspace of X, and i the canonical injection of T into X. Denote by W the set of bounded positive measures on X that are concentrated on T, equipped with the topology induced by . Then the mapping of into is a homeomorphism of onto W.
We denote again by i the mapping of into ; i is injective (§2, No. 4, Prop. 8) and maps into W (§2, No. 3, Prop. 7). If , then (§2, No. 3, Prop. 7 b)). Consequently, i is a bijection of onto W, and the inverse bijection of i is the mapping on . On the other hand, is continuous: for, if , then , and belongs to . Thus, everything comes down to showing that, for every measure and every function , one has
or again
Let be the function on that coincides with on and with on , and let and be, respectively, the upper semi-continuous regularization of and the lower semi-continuous regularization of (GT, IV, §6, No. 2). The relations
immediately imply that and both coincide with and on . Prop. 6 then yields
But one can replace and by in these two formulas, since the measures and are carried by ; we have thus obtained the desired relation.
The statement of Prop. 8 is only valid for positive measures: the mapping of into is injective and continuous, but is not in general a homeomorphism of onto its image. For example, take , ; the measures () converge tightly to 0 in as tends to 0, but do not converge tightly to 0 in (the characteristic function of belongs to ) (cf. however the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 5).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.