Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 09VH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09VH].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 2. Enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra

Let g be a Lie algebra, U its enveloping algebra, σ the canonical mapping of g into U and D a derivation of g. (a) *There exists one and only one derivation DUD_U of U such that σ∘D=DU∘σ\sigma \circ D = D_U \circ \sigma (that is such that DUD_U extends D, when g can be identified with a submodule of U under σ). (b) DUD_U leaves stable UnU_n and the set UnU^n of images in U of the homogeneous symmetric tensors of order n over g.

(c) DUD_U commutes with the principal antiautomorphism of UU.

(d) If DD is the inner derivation of gg defined by an element xx of gg, DUD_U is the inner derivation of UU defined by σ(x)\sigma(x).

Let DTD_T be the derivation of the tensor algebra TT of gg which extends DD (Lemma 4). The two-sided ideal JJ of TT generated by the

x⊗y−y⊗x−[x,y] x \otimes y - y \otimes x - [x, y]

(x,y(x, y in gg) is stable under DTD_T. For:

DT(x⊗y−y⊗x−[x,y])=Dx⊗y−y⊗Dx−[Dx,y] D_T(x \otimes y - y \otimes x - [x, y]) = Dx \otimes y - y \otimes Dx - [Dx, y]
+x⊗Dy−Dy⊗x−[x,Dy]. + x \otimes Dy - Dy \otimes x - [x, Dy].

On passing to the quotient, DTD_T defines a derivation DUD_U of UU such that σ∘D=DU∘σ\sigma \circ D = D_U \circ \sigma. The uniqueness of DUD_U is immediate since 1 and σ(g)\sigma(g) generate the algebra UU. Assertion (b) is obvious. Let AA be the principal antiautomorphism of UU. We now prove (c). If x1,…,xnx_1, \ldots, x_n are in gg, then

DUA(σ(x1)…σ(xn))=DU((−1)nσ(xn)…σ(x1)) D_U A(\sigma(x_1) \ldots \sigma(x_n)) = D_U((-1)^n \sigma(x_n) \ldots \sigma(x_1))
=(−1)n∑i=1nσ(xn)…DU(σ(xi))…σ(x1) = (-1)^n \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma(x_n) \ldots D_U(\sigma(x_i)) \ldots \sigma(x_1)
=(−1)n∑i=1nσ(xn)…σ(Dxi)…σ(x1) = (-1)^n \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma(x_n) \ldots \sigma(Dx_i) \ldots \sigma(x_1)
=A(∑i=1nσ(x1)…σ(Dxi)…σ(xn)) = A \left( \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma(x_1) \ldots \sigma(Dx_i) \ldots \sigma(x_n) \right)
=ADU(σ(x1)…σ(xn)). = AD_U(\sigma(x_1) \ldots \sigma(x_n)).

Finally, let x∈gx \in g. Let Δ\Delta be the inner derivation y↦σ(x)y−yσ(x)y \mapsto \sigma(x)y - y\sigma(x) of UU (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 4, no. 3, Example 2). Then, for x′∈gx' \in g,

(Δ∘σ)(x′)=σ(x)σ(x′)−σ(x′)σ(x)=σ([x,x′])=(σ∘ad x)(x′), (\Delta \circ \sigma)(x') = \sigma(x)\sigma(x') - \sigma(x')\sigma(x) = \sigma([x, x']) = (\sigma \circ \mathrm{ad}\, x)(x'),

whence Δ∘σ=σ∘ad x\Delta \circ \sigma = \sigma \circ \mathrm{ad}\, x. This completes the proof.

Applying Proposition 7 to the case of a commutative Lie algebra, it is seen that every endomorphism uu of a KK-module can be extended uniquely to a derivation of the symmetric algebra of this module; this derivation is derived on passing to the quotient from the derivation of the tensor algebra which extends uu.

We again take a Lie algebra gg over KK and let DD be a derivation of gg. We use the earlier notation T,S,U,GT, S, U, G. Let DT,DSD_T, D_S be the derivations of T,ST, S which extend DD and let DUD_U be the unique derivation of UU such that σ∘D=DU∘σ\sigma \circ D = D_U \circ \sigma. Since DUD_U leaves the UnU_n stable, DUD_U defines on taking quotients a derivation DGD_G of GG. Since DUD_U and DSD_S are derived from DTD_T when passing to quotients, the commutative diagram (3) proves that DGD_G can also be derived from DSD_S by the homomorphism ω\omega defined in no. 6. If further KK is a field of characteristic 0, the isomorphisms of diagram (4) map one into another the restrictions of DT,DS,DU,DGD_T, D_S, D_U, D_G to S′n,Sn,Un,Gn{S'}^n, S^n, U^n, G^n. Hence the canonical isomorphism of SS onto UU maps DSD_S to DUD_U.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.