Proposition 7
Tag 09VH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09VH].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 2. Enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra
Let g be a Lie algebra, U its enveloping algebra, σ the canonical mapping of g into U and D a derivation of g. (a) *There exists one and only one derivation of U such that (that is such that extends D, when g can be identified with a submodule of U under σ). (b) leaves stable and the set of images in U of the homogeneous symmetric tensors of order n over g.
(c) commutes with the principal antiautomorphism of .
(d) If is the inner derivation of defined by an element of , is the inner derivation of defined by .
Let be the derivation of the tensor algebra of which extends (Lemma 4). The two-sided ideal of generated by the
in ) is stable under . For:
On passing to the quotient, defines a derivation of such that . The uniqueness of is immediate since 1 and generate the algebra . Assertion (b) is obvious. Let be the principal antiautomorphism of . We now prove (c). If are in , then
Finally, let . Let be the inner derivation of (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 4, no. 3, Example 2). Then, for ,
whence . This completes the proof.
Applying Proposition 7 to the case of a commutative Lie algebra, it is seen that every endomorphism of a -module can be extended uniquely to a derivation of the symmetric algebra of this module; this derivation is derived on passing to the quotient from the derivation of the tensor algebra which extends .
We again take a Lie algebra over and let be a derivation of . We use the earlier notation . Let be the derivations of which extend and let be the unique derivation of such that . Since leaves the stable, defines on taking quotients a derivation of . Since and are derived from when passing to quotients, the commutative diagram (3) proves that can also be derived from by the homomorphism defined in no. 6. If further is a field of characteristic 0, the isomorphisms of diagram (4) map one into another the restrictions of to . Hence the canonical isomorphism of onto maps to .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.