Bourbaki

Theorem 6

Tag 0A0N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A0N].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 6. Semi-simple Lie algebras

Let gg be a Lie algebra, VV a semi-simple gg-module of finite dimension over KK, SS the symmetric algebra of VV and xSx_S the derivation of SS which extends xVx_V (so that x↦xSx \mapsto x_S is a representation of gg on SS).

(a) The algebra S0S_0 of invariants of SS is generated by a finite number of elements.

(b) For every class δ\delta of simple representations of gg of finite dimension over KK, let SδS_\delta be the isotypical component of SS of species δ\delta. Then SδS_\delta is a finitely generated S0S_0-module.

Let S‾⊂S\overline{S} \subset S be the ideal of elements of SS with no constant term. Let II be the ideal of SS generated by S0∩S‾S_0 \cap \overline{S} and let (s1,s2,…,sp)(s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_p) be a finite system of generators of the ideal I (Commutative Algebra, Chapter III, § 3). It can be assumed that the s_i belong to S_0 ∩ S̄ and are homogeneous (the x_S preserve degrees and hence each S_δ is a graded submodule). Let S_1 be the subalgebra of S generated by 1 and the s_i. Then S_1 ⊂ S_0. We show that S_1 = S_0. For this we prove that every homogeneous element s of S_0 is in S_1, arguing by induction on the degree n of s. If n = 0, our assertion is obvious. Suppose therefore n > 0 and that our assertion has been proved when the degree of s is < n. As s ∈ I, s = ∑i=1psisi′\sum_{i=1}^{p} s_i s'_i, where the s'_i are elements of S which can be assumed to be homogeneous, with deg(s'_i) = deg(s) − deg(s_i) < n. Lemma 5 can be applied, as the g-module S is semi-simple (no. 5, Corollary 2 to Theorem 4); in the notation of this lemma,

s=s♮=∑i=1p(sisi′)♮=∑i=1psisi′♮. s = s^{\natural} = \sum_{i=1}^{p} (s_i s'_i)^{\natural} = \sum_{i=1}^{p} s_i {s'_i}^{\natural}.

The {s'_i}^{\natural} are elements of S_0 which are homogeneous and of degree < n (since each S_δ is a graded submodule). Hence they are in S_1 by the induction hypothesis. Hence s ∈ S_1, which proves (a).

We now consider a simple representation of g of class δ on a finite-dimensional space M. Let L = LK(M,S)\mathscr{L}_K(M, S). For all s ∈ S and all f ∈ L, let sf be the element of L defined by (sf)(m) = s.f(m) (m ∈ M); an S-module structure is thus defined on L; as M is finite-dimensional over K, clearly L is a finitely generated S-module and hence a Noetherian S-module since the ring S is Noetherian. On the other hand, L has a canonical g-module structure. For every integer n ≥ 0 let S^n be the set of homogeneous elements of S of degree n; then the g-module LK(M,Sn)\mathscr{L}_K(M, S^n) is semi-simple (no. 5, Corollary 3 to Theorem 4) and hence the g-module L is semi-simple. Moreover, for s ∈ S, f ∈ L, x ∈ g and m ∈ M,

(xL(sf))(m)=xS((sf)(m))−(sf)(xMm)=xS(s.f(m))−s.f(xMm)=(xSs).f(m)+s.(xSf(m))−s.f(xMm)=((xSs)f)(m)+(s(xLf))(m) (x_L(sf))(m) = x_S((sf)(m)) - (sf)(x_M m) = x_S(s.f(m)) - s.f(x_M m) = (x_S s).f(m) + s.(x_S f(m)) - s.f(x_M m) = ((x_S s)f)(m) + (s(x_L f))(m)

and hence xL(sf)=(xSs)f+s(xLf)x_L(sf) = (x_S s)f + s(x_L f). We can therefore apply Lemma 5.

The subset L_0 of invariant elements of L is just the set of homomorphisms of the g-module M into the g-module S. Hence, if φ denotes the canonical homomorphism of M ⊗_K L onto S, ϕ(M⊗KL0)=Sδ\phi(M \otimes_K L_0) = S_\delta. As φ is obviously an S-module homomorphism, it suffices to show that L_0 is a finitely generated S_0-module. Let J be the sub-S-module of L generated by L_0. Since L is a Noetherian S-module, there exists a finite sequence (f_1, ..., f_q) of elements of L_0 generating the S-module J. Let L_1 be the S_0-module generated by f_1, \ldots, f_q. Then L_1 \subset L_0. On the other hand, if f \in L_0, then f=∑i=1qsifif = \sum_{i=1}^q s_i f_i with si∈Ss_i \in S for all ii and hence by Lemma 5 whose notation we adopt:

f=fh=(∑i=1qsifi)h=∑i=1qsihfi∈L1. f = f^\mathfrak{h} = \left( \sum_{i=1}^q s_i f_i \right)^\mathfrak{h} = \sum_{i=1}^q s_i^\mathfrak{h} f_i \in L_1.

Hence L0=L1L_0 = L_1, so that L0L_0 is a finite generated S0S_0-module.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.