Theorem 1 (Zassenhaus)
Tag 0A1G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A1G].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 7. Ado’s Theorem
Let be a Lie algebra which is the direct sum of an ideal and a subalgebra and a finite-dimensional representation of whose largest nilpotency ideal contains .
(a) There exists a finite-dimensional extension of to whose largest nilpotency ideal contains that of .
(b) If for all the restriction to of is nilpotent, can be chosen such that moreover the largest nilpotency ideal of contains .
Let be the enveloping algebra of . Suppose that and have the -module structures defined at the beginning of this no.
We now show that is finite-dimensional over . Let be the space on which operates and a Jordan-Hölder series of the -module . Let be the representation of on derived from (). Let be the intersection of the kernels of the (identified with representations of ). Then
and is the largest nilpotency ideal of . By § 2, no. 6, Corollary to Proposition 6, is of finite codimension in . If , the derivation of maps into , hence into and hence into . On the other hand, clearly is a sub--module of . Hence is a sub--module of . The orthogonal of in is a finite-dimensional sub--module which contains and therefore . This shows that is finite-dimensional over . For , is obviously contained in the annihilator of the -module and hence also in the annihilator of the -module .
We saw in no. 1 that the -module is isomorphic to a sub--module of a product . Hence the -module provides a finite-dimensional extension of to . Moreover, is nilpotent for ; as is an ideal of (for it contains by hypothesis), we see that is contained in the largest nilpotency ideal of . Thus (a) is proved.
Suppose finally that for all the restriction to of is nilpotent. As the elements of operate on by derivations, there exists for all and all an integer such that ; the endomorphisms derived from on and on (which are finite-dimensional spaces) are therefore nilpotent. Thus is nilpotent for all . We have seen earlier that this is also true for . As is an ideal of containing , the sum is also an ideal of . Assertion (b) of Theorem 1 then results from the following lemma:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.