Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Zassenhaus)

Tag 0A1G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A1G].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 7. Ado’s Theorem

Let g=g′+hg = g' + h be a Lie algebra which is the direct sum of an ideal g′g' and a subalgebra hh and ρ′\rho' a finite-dimensional representation of g′g' whose largest nilpotency ideal contains [h,g′][h, g'].

(a) There exists a finite-dimensional extension ρ\rho of ρ′\rho' to gg whose largest nilpotency ideal contains that of ρ′\rho'.

(b) If for all x∈hx \in h the restriction to g′g' of ad⁡gx\operatorname{ad}_gx is nilpotent, ρ\rho can be chosen such that moreover the largest nilpotency ideal of ρ\rho contains hh.

Let U′U' be the enveloping algebra of g′g'. Suppose that U′U' and U′∗{U'}^* have the gg-module structures defined at the beginning of this no.

U′∗Let I⊂U′ be the kernel of ρ′ (identified with a representation of U′). It is a two-sided ideal of U′ of finite codimension. The subspace C(ρ′) of U′∗ (cf. no. 1) is orthogonal to I. Let S be the sub-g-module of U′∗ generated by C(ρ′).C(ρ′) \begin{array}{ll} {U'}^* & \text{Let } I \subset U' \text{ be the kernel of } \rho' \text{ (identified with a representation of } U'). \text{ It is a two-sided ideal of } U' \text{ of finite codimension. The subspace } C(\rho') \text{ of } {U'}^* \text{ (cf. no. 1) is orthogonal to } I. \text{ Let } S \text{ be the sub-} g \text{-module of } {U'}^* \text{ generated by } C(\rho'). \\ C(\rho') \end{array}

We now show that SS is finite-dimensional over KK. Let V′V' be the space on which ρ′\rho' operates and V′=V0′⊃V1′⊃⋯⊃Vd′={0}V' = V'_0 \supset V'_1 \supset \cdots \supset V'_d = \{0\} a Jordan-Hölder series of the g′g'-module V′V'. Let ρi′\rho'_i be the representation of g′g' on Vi−1′/Vi′V'_{i-1}/V'_i derived from ρ′\rho' (1≤i≤d1 \leq i \leq d). Let I′⊂U′I' \subset U' be the intersection of the kernels of the ρi′\rho'_i (identified with representations of U′U'). Then

I′d⊂I⊂I′ {I'}^d \subset I \subset I'

and I′∩g′I' \cap g' is the largest nilpotency ideal of ρ′\rho'. By § 2, no. 6, Corollary to Proposition 6, I′d{I'}^d is of finite codimension in U′U'. If x∈hx \in h, the derivation u↦xu−uxu \mapsto xu - ux of U′U' maps g′g' into [h,g′]⊂I′[h, g'] \subset I', hence U′U' into I′I' and hence I′d{I'}^d into I′d{I'}^d. On the other hand, clearly I′d{I'}^d is a sub-g′g'-module of U′U'. Hence I′d{I'}^d is a sub-gg-module of U′U'. The orthogonal of I′d{I'}^d in U′∗{U'}^* is a finite-dimensional sub-gg-module which contains C(ρ′)C(\rho') and therefore SS. This shows that SS is finite-dimensional over KK. For x∈I′∩g′x \in I' \cap g', xdx^d is obviously contained in the annihilator of the gg-module U′/I′dU'/{I'}^d and hence also in the annihilator of the gg-module SS.

We saw in no. 1 that the g′g'-module V′V' is isomorphic to a sub-g′g'-module of a product (C(ρ′))n(C(\rho'))^n. Hence the gg-module SnS^n provides a finite-dimensional extension ρ\rho of ρ′\rho' to gg. Moreover, ρ(x)\rho(x) is nilpotent for x∈I′∩g′x \in I' \cap g'; as I′∩g′I' \cap g' is an ideal of gg (for it contains [h,g′][h, g'] by hypothesis), we see that I′∩g′I' \cap g' is contained in the largest nilpotency ideal of ρ\rho. Thus (a) is proved.

Suppose finally that for all x∈hx \in h the restriction to g′g' of adψx\mathrm{ad}_{\psi}x is nilpotent. As the elements of hh operate on U′U' by derivations, there exists for all u∈U′u \in U' and all x∈hx \in h an integer ee such that (xU′)e.u=0(x_{U'})^e.u = 0; the endomorphisms derived from xU′x_{U'} on U′/I′dU'/{I'}^d and on SS (which are finite-dimensional spaces) are therefore nilpotent. Thus ρ(x)\rho(x) is nilpotent for all x∈hx \in h. We have seen earlier that this is also true for x∈I′∩g′x \in I' \cap g'. As I′∩g′I' \cap g' is an ideal of g′g' containing [h,g′][h, g'], the sum h+(I′∩g′)h + (I' \cap g') is also an ideal of gg. Assertion (b) of Theorem 1 then results from the following lemma:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.