Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0A29, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A29].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter II, § 1. Enveloping bigebra of a Lie algebra

(1) Un=∑i=0nUiU_n = \sum_{i=0}^n U^i (Chapter I, § 2, no. 7, Corollary 4 to Theorem 1).

(2) The mapping η\eta is the unique morphism of graded cogebras of S(g)S(g) into UU such that η(1)=1\eta(1) = 1 and η(x)=σ(x)\eta(x) = \sigma(x) for x∈gx \in g. For if η′\eta' is a morphism satisfying these conditions, we prove by induction on nn that η′(xn)=η(xn)\eta'(x^n) = \eta(x^n) for x∈gx \in g and n>1n > 1. As cS+(xn)=∑i=1n−1(ni)xi⊗xn−ic_S^+(x^n) = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \binom{n}{i} x^i \otimes x^{n-i} by (3) and (11),

(η⊗η)(cS+(xn))=(η′⊗η′)(cS+(xn)) (\eta \otimes \eta)(c_S^+(x^n)) = (\eta' \otimes \eta')(c_S^+(x^n))
by the induction hypothesis. It follows that c+(η(xn))=c+(η′(xn))c^+(\eta(x^n)) = c^+(\eta'(x^n)); it follows that η(xn)−η′(xn)\eta(x^n) - \eta'(x^n) is a primitive element of degree nn and hence is zero (Corollary to Proposition 9).

(3) Let ψ\psi be the canonical isomorphism of the bigebra TS(g)TS(g) onto the bigebra S(g)S(g) (Algebra, Chapter IV, § 5, Corollary 1 to Proposition 12). The mapping

η∘ψ:TS(g)→U \eta \circ \psi : TS(g) \to U
is called canonical. It is the unique morphism η′\eta' of graded cogebras of TS(g)TS(g) into UU such that η′(1)=1\eta'(1) = 1 and η′(x)=σ(x)\eta'(x) = \sigma(x) for all x∈gx \in g.

(4) Let VV be a vector space. The primitive elements of the bigebra S(V)S(V) are the elements of degree 1. This follows from the Corollary to Proposition 9 applied to the commutative Lie algebra VV.

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} be a basis of the vector KK-space gg, where the indexing set II is totally ordered. For all α∈N(I)\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^{(I)}, we write

eα=∏i∈Iσ(ei)α(i)α(i)!. e_\alpha = \prod_{i \in I} \frac{\sigma(e_i)^{\alpha(i)}}{\alpha(i)!}.
The eαe_\alpha, for ∣α∣≤n|\alpha| \leq n, form a basis of the vector KK-space UnU_n (Chapter I, § 2, no. 7, Corollary 3 to Theorem 1). Then
e0=1,eei=σ(ei)for i∈I. e_0 = 1, \quad e_{e_i} = \sigma(e_i) \quad \text{for } i \in I.

As the graded algebra associated with the filtered algebra U is commutative (loc. cit., Theorem 1), for α,β\alpha, \beta in N(Ω)\mathbf{N}^{(\Omega)},

eα⋅eβ≡((α,β))⋅eα+βmod  U∣α∣+∣β∣−1. e_{\alpha} \cdot e_{\beta} \equiv ((\alpha, \beta)) \cdot e_{\alpha + \beta} \mod U_{|\alpha| + |\beta| - 1}.

where

((α,β))=∏i∈I(α(i)+β(i))!α(i)!β(i)!. ((\alpha, \beta)) = \prod_{i \in I} \frac{(\alpha(i) + \beta(i))!}{\alpha(i)! \beta(i)!}.

On the other hand, we have immediately

ε(e0)=1,ε(eα)=0for ∣α∣≥1. \varepsilon(e_0) = 1, \quad \varepsilon(e_{\alpha}) = 0 \quad \text{for } |\alpha| \geq 1.

Finally, formula (12) implies that, for α∈N(Ω)\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^{(\Omega)},

c(eα)=∑β+γ=αeβ⊗eγ. c(e_{\alpha}) = \sum_{\beta + \gamma = \alpha} e_{\beta} \otimes e_{\gamma}.

This formula allows us to determine the algebra U′=Hom(U,K)U' = \mathrm{Hom}(U, K) dual to the cogebra U (Algebra, Chapter III, § 11, no. 2). For let K[[Xi]]i∈IK[[X_i]]_{i \in I} be the algebra of formal power series in indeterminates (Xi)i∈I(X_i)_{i \in I} (cf. Algebra, Chapter III, § 2, no. 11); if λ∈U′\lambda \in U', let fλf_{\lambda} denote the formal power series

fλ=∑α⟨λ,eα⟩Xα,where Xα=∏i∈IXiα(i) f_{\lambda} = \sum_{\alpha} \langle \lambda, e_{\alpha} \rangle X^{\alpha}, \quad \text{where } X^{\alpha} = \prod_{i \in I} X_i^{\alpha(i)}

and the summation index α\alpha runs through N(Ω)\mathbf{N}^{(\Omega)}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.