Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0A6S, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A6S].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter II, § 8. Convergence of the Hausdorff series (ultrametric case)

Let rr and ss be two integers ⩾0\geqslant 0. If Hr,s=∑b∈BλbebH_{r,s} = \sum_{b \in B} \lambda_b e_b, where λb∈Q\lambda_b \in \mathbf{Q}, is the decomposition of H\mathbf{H} with respect to the basis (eb)b∈B(e_b)_{b \in B}, then

vp(λb)⩾−(r+s−1)θfor all b∈B. v_p(\lambda_b) \geqslant -(r + s - 1)\theta \quad \text{for all } b \in B.
The ring AZ(p)(I)\mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}}(I) is identified with the sub-Z(p)\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}-module of AQ(I)\mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{Q}}(I) generated by the words w∈Mo(I)w \in \mathrm{Mo}(I). As LZ(p)(I)\mathbf{L}_{\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}}(I) is a direct factor of AZ(p)(I)\mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}}(I),
LZ(p)(I)=AZ(p)(I)∩LQ(I). \mathbf{L}_{\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}}(I) = \mathbf{A}_{\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}}(I) \cap \mathbf{L}_{\mathbf{Q}}(I).

Let ff be the integer such that f≤(r+s−1)θ<f+1f \leq (r + s - 1)\theta < f + 1. Relation (4) is equivalent to vp(λb)≥−fv_p(\lambda_b) \geq -f for all b∈Bb \in B, that is Hr,s∈p−fLZ(p)H_{r,s} \in p^{-f}L_{\mathbf{Z}(p)}. But this is equivalent also by (5) to Hr,s∈p−fAZ(p)(I)H_{r,s} \in p^{-f}A_{\mathbf{Z}(p)}(I).

By formula (11) of § 6, no. 4, it suffices to show that, for every integer m≥1m \geq 1 and all integers r1,…,rm,s1,…,smr_1, \ldots, r_m, s_1, \ldots, s_m such that

r1+⋯+rm=r,s1+⋯+sm=s, r_1 + \cdots + r_m = r, \quad s_1 + \cdots + s_m = s,
ri+si≥1for 1≤i≤m, r_i + s_i \geq 1 \quad \text{for } 1 \leq i \leq m,
we have
vp(m!r!…rm!s1!…sm!)≤f. v_p(m!r!\ldots r_m!s_1!\ldots s_m!) \leq f.
But by Lemma 2, vp(ri!si!)≤(ri+si−1)θv_p(r_i!s_i!) \leq (r_i + s_i - 1)\theta and vp(m!)≤vp(m!)≤(m−1)θv_p(m!) \leq v_p(m!) \leq (m - 1)\theta; the left hand side of (7) is therefore bounded above by
θ(m−1+∑i=1m(ri+si−1))=θ(r+s−1); \theta(m - 1 + \sum_{i=1}^m (r_i + s_i - 1)) = \theta(r + s - 1);
as it is an integer, it is ≤f\leq f, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.