Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 0A7Q, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A7Q].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 1. Lie groups

Let G be a Lie group and X a manifold of class CrC^r with a law of left operation of class CrC^r of G on X. Suppose that:

(a) the group G operates properly and freely on X;

(b) for all x∈Xx \in X, ρ(x)\rho(x) is an immersion (which is a consequence of (a) if K is of characteristic 0 and X is finite-dimensional).

Then the equivalence relation defined by G on X is regular (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.5). There exists on the quotient set X/G one and only one manifold structure such that the canonical mapping π:X→X/G\pi : X \to X/G is a submersion. The underlying topology of this manifold structure is the quotient topology of that on X; it is Hausdorff. Finally, (X,G,X/G,π)(X, G, X/G, \pi) is a principal left fibre bundle.\footnote{† The principal fibre bundles defined in Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 6.2.1 are principal right fibre bundles. The definition of principal left fibre bundles can be deduced from this in an obvious way.}

Let θ\theta be the mapping (g,x)↦(x,gx)(g, x) \mapsto (x, gx) of G×XG \times X into X×XX \times X. This mapping is of class CτC^\tau. We show that it is an immersion. For u∈Tg(G)u \in T_g(G) and v∈Tx(X)v \in T_x(X), by (6),

T(g,x)(θ)(u,v)=(v,Tg(ρ(x))u+Tx(τ(g))v). T_{(g, x)}(\theta)(u, v) = (v, T_g(\rho(x))u + T_x(\tau(g))v).

But Tg(ρ(x))T_g(\rho(x)) is injective by hypothesis (b) and hence T(g,x)(θ)T_{(g, x)}(\theta) is injective. Its image is the topological direct sum of the subspace Hg,xH_{g, x} consisting of the vectors (v,Tx(τ(g))v)(v, T_x(\tau(g))v) for v∈Tx(X)v \in T_x(X) and the subspace

Ig,x={0}×Tg(ρ(x))(Tg(G)). I_{g, x} = \{0\} \times T_g(\rho(x))(T_g(G)).

By hypothesis (b), Tg(ρ(x))(Tg(G))T_g(\rho(x))(T_g(G)) admits a topological supplement Jg,xJ_{g, x} in Tgx(X)T_{gx}(X). Hence the image of T(g,x)(θ)T_{(g, x)}(\theta) admits the topological supplement {0}×Jg,x\{0\} \times J_{g, x}. Hence we have proved that θ\theta is an immersion of G×XG \times X in X×XX \times X.

As G operates freely on X, θ\theta is injective. Let C be the graph of the equivalence relation R defined by G on X. As G operates properly, θ\theta is a homeomorphism of G×XG \times X onto C (General Topology, Chapter I, § 10, Proposition 2). By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.8.3, it is a submanifold of X×XX \times X and θ\theta is an isomorphism of the manifold G×XG \times X onto the manifold C. The tangent space T(x,gx)(C)T_{(x, gx)}(C) is identified with

T(g,x)(θ)(T(g,x)(G×X))=Hg,x⊕Ig,x⊂T(x,gx)(X×X). T_{(g, x)}(\theta)(T_{(g, x)}(G \times X)) = H_{g, x} \oplus I_{g, x} \subset T_{(x, gx)}(X \times X).

Let pr1_1 and pr2_2 be the canonical projections of X×XX \times X onto the two factors. It is immediate that T(x,gx)(pr1)T_{(x, gx)}(\mathrm{pr}_1) maps Hg,xH_{g, x} onto Tx(X)T_x(X) and that the kernel of T(x,gx)(pr1)∣T(x,gx)(C)T_{(x, gx)}(\mathrm{pr}_1) | T_{(x, gx)}(C) is Ig,xI_{g, x}. Thus pr1∣C\mathrm{pr}_1 | C is a submersion of C onto X. By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.5, R is regular. By definition, there therefore exists on the quotient set X/G one and only one manifold structure such that π\pi is a submersion. The underlying topology of X/G is the quotient topology of that of X (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.4). This topology is Hausdorff (General Topology, Chapter III, § 4, Proposition 3).

For all b∈X/Gb \in X/G, there exist an open neighbourhood W of b and a morphism σ:W→X\sigma : W \to X such that π∘σ=idW\pi \circ \sigma = \mathrm{id}_W (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.1). Let ϕ\phi be the bijection (g,w)↦gσ(w)(g, w) \mapsto g\sigma(w) of G×WG \times W onto π−1(W)\pi^{-1}(W). It is of class CτC^\tau. Then π(gσ(w))=w\pi(g\sigma(w)) = w and

θ−1(σ(w),gσ(w))=(g,σ(w)) \theta^{-1}(\sigma(w), g\sigma(w)) = (g, \sigma(w))

and hence the inverse bijection of ϕ\phi is of class CrC^r. Clearly ϕ(gg′,w)=gϕ(g′,w)\phi(gg', w) = g\phi(g', w) for w∈W, g∈G, g′∈Gw \in W,\ g \in G,\ g' \in G. Hence (X,G,X/G,π)(X, G, X/G, \pi) is a principal left fibre bundle.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.