Bourbaki

Proposition 13

Tag 0A7V, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A7V].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 1. Lie groups

Let GG be a Lie group, HH a normal Lie subgroup of GG, XX a manifold of class CrC^r and (g,x)↦gx(g, x) \mapsto gx a law of left operation of class CrC^r of GG on XX. Suppose that conditions (a) and (b) of Proposition 10 hold.

(i) The law of left operation (h,x)↦hx(h, x) \mapsto hx of HH on XX satisfies conditions (a) and (b) of Proposition 10 (so that we can consider the quotient manifolds X/GX/G and X/HX/H).

(ii) The law of left operation of GG on XX defines on taking quotients a law of left operation of class CrC^r of G/HG/H on X/HX/H; this law satisfies conditions (a) and (b) of Proposition 10 (so that we can consider the quotient manifold (X/H)/(G/H)(X/H)/(G/H)).

(iii) The canonical mapping of XX onto X/HX/H defines on taking quotients a bijection of X/GX/G onto (X/H)/(G/H)(X/H)/(G/H). This bijection is an isomorphism of manifolds of class CrC^r.

Clearly HH operates freely on XX; it operates properly by General Topology, Chapter III, § 4, no. 1, Example 1. The orbital mappings of HH on XX are immersions since the canonical injection of HH into GG is an immersion. This proves (i).

The law of left operation of GG on XX obviously defines, on taking quotients, a law of left operation of G/HG/H on X/HX/H. This law is of class CrC^r by Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.6. Let g∈Gg \in G and x∈Xx \in X be such that (Hg)(Hx)=Hx(Hg)(Hx) = Hx; then H(gx)=HxH(gx) = Hx and hence gx∈Hxgx \in Hx and g∈Hg \in H; this proves that G/HG/H operates freely on X/HX/H. The mapping θ:(g,x)↦(x,gx)\theta : (g, x) \mapsto (x, gx) of G×XG \times X into X×XX \times X is closed; on the other hand, θ(Hg×Hx)=Hx×H(gx)\theta(Hg \times Hx) = Hx \times H(gx); it follows immediately that the mapping

(Hg,Hx)↦(Hx,H(gx))(Hg, Hx) \mapsto (Hx, H(gx))

of (G/H)×(X/H)(G/H) \times (X/H) into (X/H)×(X/H)(X/H) \times (X/H) is closed; as moreover G/HG/H operates freely on X/HX/H, Theorem 1 (c) of General Topology, Chapter I, § 10, no. 2 proves that G/HG/H operates properly on X/HX/H.

Let π\pi be the canonical mapping of XX onto X/HX/H, σ\sigma the canonical mapping of GG onto G/HG/H, xx an element of XX and y=π(x)y = \pi(x).

G→ρ(x)X↓σ↓πG/H→ρ(y)X/H \begin{array}{ccc} G & \xrightarrow{\rho(x)} & X \\ \downarrow \sigma & & \downarrow \pi \\ G/H & \xrightarrow{\rho(y)} & X/H \end{array}

Then π∘ρ(x)=ρ(y)∘σ\pi \circ \rho(x) = \rho(y) \circ \sigma and hence

Tx(π)∘Te(ρ(x))=Te(ρ(y))∘Te(σ). T_x(\pi) \circ T_e(\rho(x)) = T_e(\rho(y)) \circ T_e(\sigma).

Let u∈Te(G/H)u \in T_e(G/H) be such that Te(ρ(y))u=0T_e(\rho(y))u = 0. There exists v∈Te(G)v \in T_e(G) such that u=Te(σ)vu = T_e(\sigma)v. Then Tx(π)(Te(ρ(x))v)=0T_x(\pi)(T_e(\rho(x))v) = 0, hence Te(ρ(x))vT_e(\rho(x))v is tangent to HxHx (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.10.5) and therefore is of the form Te(ρ(x)∣H)v′T_e(\rho(x) | H)v' for some v′∈Te(H)v' \in T_e(H). As Te(ρ(x))T_e(\rho(x)) is injective, it follows that v=v′v = v', whence v∈Te(H)v \in T_e(H) and therefore u=0u = 0. Thus Te(ρ(y))T_e(\rho(y)) is injective. The image of Te(ρ(y))T_e(\rho(y)) is equal to that of Tx(π)∘Te(ρ(x))T_x(\pi) \circ T_e(\rho(x)); now the image of Te(ρ(x))T_e(\rho(x)) admits a topological supplement in Tx(X)T_x(X) and contains the kernel of Tx(π)T_x(\pi). It is therefore seen that ρ(y)\rho(y) is an immersion, which completes the proof of (ii).

Assertion (iii) follows from the above and Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 5.9.7.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.