Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0ACQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ACQ].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let L be a complete normed Lie algebra over K. Let G be the set of x∈Lx \in L such that ∥x∥<λ\|x\| < \lambda. Let H:G×G→GH : G \times G \to G be the Hausdorff function of L (Chapter II, § 8, no. 3). (i) With the law of composition H, G is a Lie group in which 0 is identity element and −x-x the inverse of x for all x∈Gx \in G. (ii) Let ϕ\phi be the identity mapping of G into L. The differential of ϕ\phi at 0 is an isomorphism of the normable Lie algebra L(G)L(G) onto L. (iii) For all μ∈R+∗\mu \in \mathbf{R}_+^*, let GμG_\mu be the set of x∈Lx \in L such that ∥x∥<μ\|x\| < \mu. Then the GμG_\mu, for μ<λ\mu < \lambda, form a fundamental system of open and closed neighbourhoods of 0 and are subgroups of G. Assertions (i) and (iii) follow from Chapter II, § 8, no. 3, Proposition 3 and (ii) can be proved as in Lemma 2.

G is called the Lie group defined by L.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.