Bourbaki

Proposition 20

Tag 0AG5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AG5].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 6. Real and complex Lie groups

Let G be a finite-dimensional real Lie group.

(i) There exist a complex Lie group G~\tilde{G} and an R\mathbf{R}-analytic morphism γ\gamma of G into G~\tilde{G} with the following properties: for every complex Lie group H and every R\mathbf{R}-analytic morphism ϕ\phi of G into H, there exists one and only one C\mathbf{C}-analytic morphism ψ\psi of G~\tilde{G} into H such that ϕ=ψ∘γ\phi = \psi \circ \gamma.

(ii) If (G~′,γ′)(\tilde{G}', \gamma') has the same properties as (G~,γ)(\tilde{G}, \gamma), there exists one and only one isomorphism θ\theta of G~\tilde{G} onto G~′\tilde{G}' such that θ∘γ=γ′\theta \circ \gamma = \gamma'.

(iii) The C\mathbf{C}-linear mapping of L(G)⊗CL(G) \otimes \mathbf{C} into L(G~)L(\tilde{G}) which extends L(γ)L(\gamma) is surjective; in particular dim⁡C(G~)≤dim⁡R(G)\dim_{\mathbf{C}}(\tilde{G}) \leq \dim_{\mathbf{R}}(G).

Assertion (ii) is obvious. We prove the existence of an ordered pair (G~,γ)(\tilde{G}, \gamma) with properties (i) and (iii).

(a) Suppose first that G is connected. Let g=L(G)g = L(G), gC=g⊗RCg_C = g \otimes_{\mathbf{R}} \mathbf{C} be the complexification of g, S (resp. S') the simply connected real (resp. complex) Lie group with Lie algebra g (resp. gCg_C) and σ\sigma the unique R\mathbf{R}-analytic morphism of S into S' such that L(σ)L(\sigma) is the canonical injection of g into gCg_C. Let π\pi be the unique R\mathbf{R}-analytic morphism of S onto G such that L(π)=IdL(G)L(\pi) = \mathrm{Id}_{L(G)} and F = Ker π\pi.

S→σS′↓π↓λG→γG↘ϕ↙ψH \begin{array}{ccc} S & \xrightarrow{\sigma} & S' \\ \downarrow \pi & & \downarrow \lambda \\ G & \xrightarrow{\gamma} & G \\ & \searrow \phi & \swarrow \psi \\ & & H \end{array}

For every complex Lie group H and every R\mathbf{R}-analytic morphism ϕ\phi of G into H, L(ϕ):g→L(H)L(\phi): g \to L(H) has a unique C\mathbf{C}-linear extension to gCg_C and this extension is of the form L(ϕ∗)L(\phi^*), where ϕ∗\phi^* is a C\mathbf{C}-analytic morphism of S' into H. Then

L(ϕ∘π)=L(ϕ)∘L(π)=L(ϕ)=L(ϕ∗)∘L(σ)=L(ϕ∗∘σ) L(\phi \circ \pi) = L(\phi) \circ L(\pi) = L(\phi) = L(\phi^*) \circ L(\sigma) = L(\phi^* \circ \sigma)
and hence ϕ∘π=ϕ∗∘σ\phi \circ \pi = \phi^* \circ \sigma. Therefore ϕ∗(σ(F))=ϕ(π(F))={e}\phi^*(\sigma(F)) = \phi(\pi(F)) = \{e\}, whence
σ(F)⊂Ker ϕ∗. \sigma(F) \subset \mathrm{Ker}\, \phi^*.
Let P be the intersection of the Ker ϕ∗\mathrm{Ker}\, \phi^* for variable ϕ\phi. This is a normal Lie subgroup of S' (no. 2, Corollary 3 to Proposition 1). Let G~=S′/P\tilde{G} = S'/P and λ: S' → Ġ be the canonical morphism. Then σ(F) ⊂ P and hence there exists one and only one R-analytic morphism γ of G into Ġ such that γ ∘ π = λ ∘ σ. If ψ: Ġ → H denotes the morphism derived from φ* when passing to the quotient, then

(φ∘γ)∘π=ψ∘(λ∘σ)=φ∗∘σ=φ∘π(\varphi \circ \gamma) \circ \pi = \psi \circ (\lambda \circ \sigma) = \varphi^* \circ \sigma = \varphi \circ \pi

whence ψ ∘ γ = φ. Clearly L(ψ), and hence ψ, are determined uniquely by the equality ψ ∘ γ = φ. Thus we have proved that the ordered pair (\tilde{G}, γ) has properties (i) and (iii).

(b) We pass now to the general case. Let F be the identity component of G, M = G/F and i: F → G and p: G → M be the canonical morphisms. We apply part (a) of the proof to F. We obtain an ordered pair (\tilde{F}, δ). For all g ∈ G, Int g|F = ω'(g) is an automorphism of F. By the universal property of \tilde{F}, there exists one and only one automorphism ω(g) of the complex Lie group \tilde{F} such that δ ∘ ω'(g) = ω(g) ∘ δ. Clearly ω is a morphism of G into Aut(\tilde{H}). If g ∈ G and f ∈ F, then

δ(gfg−1)=(δ∘ω′(g))(f)=(ω(g)∘δ)(f)=ω(g)(δ(f)).\delta(gf g^{-1}) = (\delta \circ \omega'(g))(f) = (\omega(g) \circ \delta)(f) = \omega(g)(\delta(f)).

If f ∈ F, then δ ∘ (Int_F f) = (Int_\tilde{F} δ(f)) ∘ δ and Int_\tilde{F} δ(f) is an automorphism of the complex Lie group \tilde{F}; hence Int_\tilde{F} δ(f) = ω(f).

Hence Lemma 7 can be applied, which gives a diagram

F→iG→pM↓δ↓γ↓IdF~→i~G~→p~M. \begin{array}{ccccc} F & \xrightarrow{i} & G & \xrightarrow{p} & M \\ \downarrow{\delta} & & \downarrow{\gamma} & & \downarrow{\mathrm{Id}} \\ \tilde{F} & \xrightarrow{\tilde{i}} & \tilde{G} & \xrightarrow{\tilde{p}} & M. \end{array}

Let \tilde{F} be identified with a normal subgroup of \tilde{G} by means of ī. The group \tilde{G} is generated by \tilde{F} and γ(G); hence the automorphisms of \tilde{F} defined by the elements of \tilde{G} are automorphisms of the complex Lie group structure. By § 1, no. 9, Proposition 18, there exists one and only one complex Lie group structure on \tilde{G} such that \tilde{F} is an open Lie subgroup of \tilde{G}. Henceforth \tilde{G} will have this structure. As δ is R-analytic, γ is R-analytic.

The ordered pair (\tilde{G}, γ) has property (iii) of the proposition. We show that it has property (i). Let H be a complex Lie group and ψ an R-analytic morphism of G into H. There exists a C-analytic morphism η of \tilde{F} into H such that η ∘ δ = φ|F. Let g ∈ G. The mappings

f↦η(ω(g)f),f↦ϕ(g)η(f)ϕ(g)−1f \mapsto \eta(\omega(g)f), \quad f \mapsto \phi(g)\eta(f)\phi(g)^{-1}

of \tilde{F} into H are C-analytic morphisms; they coincide on δ(F), for, if f' ∈ F, then

ϕ(g)η(δ(f′))ϕ(g)−1=ϕ(g)ϕ(f′)ϕ(g)−1=ϕ(gf′g−1)\phi(g)\eta(\delta(f'))\phi(g)^{-1} = \phi(g)\phi(f')\phi(g)^{-1} = \phi(gf'g^{-1})
=η(δ(gf′g−1))=η(ω(g)δ(f′));= \eta(\delta(gf'g^{-1})) = \eta(\omega(g)\delta(f'));

therefore η(ω(g)f)=ϕ(g)η(f)ϕ(g)−1\eta(\omega(g)f) = \phi(g)\eta(f)\phi(g)^{-1} for all g∈Gg \in G and all f∈F~f \in \tilde{F}. If G′G' denotes the semi-direct product of GG by F~\tilde{F} relative to ω\omega, there then exists a morphism ζ\zeta of the group G′G' into HH which coincides with ϕ\phi on GG and with η\eta on F~\tilde{F}. For f∈Ff \in F,

ζ(δ(f−1)f)=η(δ(f−1))ϕ(f)=ϕ(f−1)ϕ(f)=e. \zeta(\delta(f^{-1})f) = \eta(\delta(f^{-1}))\phi(f) = \phi(f^{-1})\phi(f) = e.
Hence ζ\zeta defines on passing to the quotient a morphism ψ\psi of G~\tilde{G} into HH. Then ψ∘γ=ϕ\psi \circ \gamma = \phi and ψ∘i~=η\psi \circ \tilde{i} = \eta; the latter inequality implies that ψ\psi is C\mathbf{C}-analytic.

Finally, let ψ′\psi' be a C\mathbf{C}-analytic morphism of G~\tilde{G} into HH such that ϕ=ϕ′∘γ\phi = \phi' \circ \gamma. Then

ψ′∘i~∘δ=ψ′∘γ∘i=ϕ∘i=ψ∘i~∘δ \psi' \circ \tilde{i} \circ \delta = \psi' \circ \gamma \circ i = \phi \circ i = \psi \circ \tilde{i} \circ \delta
and hence ψ′∘i~=ψ∘i~\psi' \circ \tilde{i} = \psi \circ \tilde{i}. As G~\tilde{G} is generated by i~(F~)\tilde{i}(\tilde{F}) and γ(G)\gamma(G), ψ′=ψ\psi' = \psi.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.