(i) There exist a complex Lie group G~ and an R-analytic morphism γ of G into G~ with the following properties: for every complex Lie group H and every R-analytic morphism ϕ of G into H, there exists one and only one C-analytic morphism ψ of G~ into H such that ϕ=ψ∘γ.
(ii) If (G~′,γ′) has the same properties as (G~,γ), there exists one and only one isomorphism θ of G~ onto G~′ such that θ∘γ=γ′.
(iii) The C-linear mapping of L(G)⊗C into L(G~) which extends L(γ) is surjective; in particular dimC(G~)≤dimR(G).
Assertion (ii) is obvious. We prove the existence of an ordered pair (G~,γ) with properties (i) and (iii).
(a) Suppose first that G is connected. Let g=L(G), gC=g⊗RC be the complexification of g, S (resp. S') the simply connected real (resp. complex) Lie group with Lie algebra g (resp. gC) and σ the unique R-analytic morphism of S into S' such that L(σ) is the canonical injection of g into gC. Let π be the unique R-analytic morphism of S onto G such that L(π)=IdL(G) and F = Ker π.
S↓πGσγ↘ϕS′↓λG↙ψH
For every complex Lie group H and every R-analytic morphism ϕ of G into H, L(ϕ):g→L(H) has a unique C-linear extension to gC and this extension is of the form L(ϕ∗), where ϕ∗ is a C-analytic morphism of S' into H. Then
L(ϕ∘π)=L(ϕ)∘L(π)=L(ϕ)=L(ϕ∗)∘L(σ)=L(ϕ∗∘σ)
and hence ϕ∘π=ϕ∗∘σ. Therefore ϕ∗(σ(F))=ϕ(π(F))={e}, whence
σ(F)⊂Kerϕ∗.
Let P be the intersection of the Kerϕ∗ for variable ϕ. This is a normal Lie subgroup of S' (no. 2, Corollary 3 to Proposition 1). Let G~=S′/P and λ: S' → Ġ be the canonical morphism. Then σ(F) ⊂ P and hence there exists one and only one R-analytic morphism γ of G into Ġ such that γ ∘ π = λ ∘ σ. If ψ: Ġ → H denotes the morphism derived from φ* when passing to the quotient, then
(φ∘γ)∘π=ψ∘(λ∘σ)=φ∗∘σ=φ∘π
whence ψ ∘ γ = φ. Clearly L(ψ), and hence ψ, are determined uniquely by the equality ψ ∘ γ = φ. Thus we have proved that the ordered pair (\tilde{G}, γ) has properties (i) and (iii).
(b) We pass now to the general case. Let F be the identity component of G, M = G/F and i: F → G and p: G → M be the canonical morphisms. We apply part (a) of the proof to F. We obtain an ordered pair (\tilde{F}, δ). For all g ∈ G, Int g|F = ω'(g) is an automorphism of F. By the universal property of \tilde{F}, there exists one and only one automorphism ω(g) of the complex Lie group \tilde{F} such that δ ∘ ω'(g) = ω(g) ∘ δ. Clearly ω is a morphism of G into Aut(\tilde{H}). If g ∈ G and f ∈ F, then
δ(gfg−1)=(δ∘ω′(g))(f)=(ω(g)∘δ)(f)=ω(g)(δ(f)).
If f ∈ F, then δ ∘ (Int_F f) = (Int_\tilde{F} δ(f)) ∘ δ and Int_\tilde{F} δ(f) is an automorphism of the complex Lie group \tilde{F}; hence Int_\tilde{F} δ(f) = ω(f).
Hence Lemma 7 can be applied, which gives a diagram
F↓δF~ii~G↓γG~pp~M↓IdM.
Let \tilde{F} be identified with a normal subgroup of \tilde{G} by means of ī. The group \tilde{G} is generated by \tilde{F} and γ(G); hence the automorphisms of \tilde{F} defined by the elements of \tilde{G} are automorphisms of the complex Lie group structure. By § 1, no. 9, Proposition 18, there exists one and only one complex Lie group structure on \tilde{G} such that \tilde{F} is an open Lie subgroup of \tilde{G}. Henceforth \tilde{G} will have this structure. As δ is R-analytic, γ is R-analytic.
The ordered pair (\tilde{G}, γ) has property (iii) of the proposition. We show that it has property (i). Let H be a complex Lie group and ψ an R-analytic morphism of G into H. There exists a C-analytic morphism η of \tilde{F} into H such that η ∘ δ = φ|F. Let g ∈ G. The mappings
f↦η(ω(g)f),f↦ϕ(g)η(f)ϕ(g)−1
of \tilde{F} into H are C-analytic morphisms; they coincide on δ(F), for, if f' ∈ F, then
ϕ(g)η(δ(f′))ϕ(g)−1=ϕ(g)ϕ(f′)ϕ(g)−1=ϕ(gf′g−1)
=η(δ(gf′g−1))=η(ω(g)δ(f′));
therefore η(ω(g)f)=ϕ(g)η(f)ϕ(g)−1 for all g∈G and all f∈F~. If G′ denotes the semi-direct product of G by F~ relative to ω, there then exists a morphism ζ of the group G′ into H which coincides with ϕ on G and with η on F~. For f∈F,
ζ(δ(f−1)f)=η(δ(f−1))ϕ(f)=ϕ(f−1)ϕ(f)=e.
Hence ζ defines on passing to the quotient a morphism ψ of G~ into H. Then ψ∘γ=ϕ and ψ∘i~=η; the latter inequality implies that ψ is C-analytic.
Finally, let ψ′ be a C-analytic morphism of G~ into H such that ϕ=ϕ′∘γ. Then
ψ′∘i~∘δ=ψ′∘γ∘i=ϕ∘i=ψ∘i~∘δ
and hence ψ′∘i~=ψ∘i~. As G~ is generated by i~(F~) and γ(G), ψ′=ψ.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.