Let a,b,c,c′ be non-zero ideals of A contained in m such that
c′⊂c,ab⊂c,ab2⊂c′,a2b⊂c′.
If x∈G(a) and y∈G(b), then x[−1]y[−1]x.y,x.y.x[−1]y[−1] and [x,y] belong to G(c′) and are congruent modulo G(c′).
By § 5, no. 2, Proposition 1, there exist cαβ∈A′ such that
x[−1]y[−1]x.y−[x,y]=∣α∣+∣β∣≥3∑cαβxαyβ. If
x=0 or
y=0, then
x[−1]y[−1]x.y−[x,y]=0; hence
c0β=cα0=0. On the other hand, the conditions
x∈G(a),y∈G(b),∣α∣≥1,∣β∣≥1,∣α∣+∣β∣≥3 imply
cαβxαyβ∈G(a2b+ab2)⊂G(c′) and hence
x[−1]y[−1]x.y−[x,y]∈G(c′). We see similarly that
x.y.x[−1]y[−1]−[x,y]∈G(c′). Finally, by § 5, formula (13),
[x,y]∈G(ab)⊂G(c).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.