(i) The family (G(aλ)) is a central filtration on G (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Definition 2). (ii) For λ∈R+∗, G(aλ)={x∈G∣ω(x)≥λ}, G(aλ+)={x∈G∣ω(x)>λ}. (ii) is obvious. We prove (i). Clearly G(aλ)=⋂μ<λG(aμ) and G=⋃λ>0G(aλ). On the other hand, if x∈G(aλ) and y∈G(aμ), then
x[−1]y[−1]x.y∈G(aλ+μ) by Proposition 6 applied with
a=aλ,b=aμ,c=c′=aλ+μ.
By Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, we can form the group gr(G) associated with the group G, with the central filtration (G(aλ)). Writing Gλ=G(aλ)/G(aλ+) for all λ>0, we obtain gr(G)=⨁λ>0Gλ. Recall (loc. cit., Proposition 1) that the commutator in G allows us to define a bracket in gr(G) with which gr(G) is a Lie algebra, as follows: if xˉ∈Gλ and yˉ∈Gμ, choose a representative x of xˉ in G(aλ) and a representative y of yˉ in G(aμ); then [xˉ,yˉ] is the class of x[−1]y[−1]x.y∈G(aλ+μ) in Gλ+μ. By Proposition 6, applied with a=aλ,b=aμ,c=aλ+μ,c′=aλ+μ+, we see that [xˉ,yˉ] is also the class of [x,y] in Gλ+μ. Thus, when G is considered as a Lie subalgebra of L(G)=Kr, filtered by the G(aλ), the associated graded Lie algebra (Chapter II, § 4, no. 3) is equal to gr(G).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.