Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 0ANA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ANA].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 2. Tits Systems

Let (G,B,N,S)(G, B, N, S) be a Tits system, and let ZZ be a normal subgroup of GG contained in BB. Let G′=G/Z,B′=B/Z,N′=N/(Z∩N)G' = G/Z, B' = B/Z, N' = N/(Z \cap N), and let S′S' be the image of SS in N′/(B′∩N′)N'/(B' \cap N'). Then one sees immediately that (G′,B′,N′,S′)(G', B', N', S') is a Tits system.

Throughout this paragraph, with (G,B,N,S)(G, B, N, S) denoting a Tits system, we set T=B∩NT = B \cap N and W=N/TW = N/T. A double coset means a double coset of GG with respect to BB. For any w∈Ww \in W, we set C(w)=BwBC(w) = BwB; this is a double coset.

We are going to deduce several elementary consequences of the axioms (T1) to (T4). We denote by w,w′,…w, w', \ldots elements of WW and by s,s′,…s, s', \ldots elements of SS. The following relations are clear:

C(1)=B,C(ww′)⊂C(w).C(w′),C(w−1)=C(w)−1. C(1) = B, \quad C(ww') \subset C(w).C(w'), \quad C(w^{-1}) = C(w)^{-1}.

Axiom (T3) can also be written in the form

C(s).C(w)⊂C(w)∪C(sw). C(s).C(w) \subset C(w) \cup C(sw).

Moreover, since C(sw)⊂C(s).C(w)C(sw) \subset C(s).C(w) by (1) and since C(s).C(w)C(s).C(w) is a union of double cosets, there are only two possibilities:

C(s).C(w)={C(sw)if C(w)⊄C(s).C(w)C(w)∪C(sw)if C(w)⊂C(s).C(w). C(s).C(w) = \begin{cases} C(sw) & \text{if } C(w) \not\subset C(s).C(w) \\ C(w) \cup C(sw) & \text{if } C(w) \subset C(s).C(w). \end{cases}

By (T4), B≠C(s).C(s)B \neq C(s).C(s); putting w=sw = s in (3) and using the relation s2=1s^2 = 1, we obtain

C(s).C(s)=B∪C(s). C(s).C(s) = B \cup C(s).

This formula shows that B∪C(s)B \cup C(s) is a subgroup of GG. Multiplying both sides of (4) on the right by C(w)C(w), and using formula (3) and the relation

B.C(w)=C(w), B.C(w) = C(w),

we obtain

C(s).C(s).C(w)=C(w)∪C(sw). C(s).C(s).C(w) = C(w) \cup C(sw).

Taking the inverses of the sets entering into formulas (2), (3) and (5) and then replacing ww by w−1w^{-1}, we obtain the formulas

C(w).C(s)⊂C(w)∪C(ws) C(w).C(s) \subset C(w) \cup C(ws)
C(w).C(s)={C(ws)if C(w)⊄C(w).C(s)C(w)∪C(ws)if C(w)⊂C(w).C(s) C(w).C(s) = \begin{cases} C(ws) & \text{if } C(w) \not\subset C(w).C(s) \\ C(w) \cup C(ws) & \text{if } C(w) \subset C(w).C(s) \end{cases}
C(w).C(s).C(s)=C(w)∪C(ws). C(w).C(s).C(s) = C(w) \cup C(ws).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.