Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0ANC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ANC].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 2. Tits Systems

We have G=BWBG = \mathrm{BWB}. The map w↦C(w)w \mapsto C(w) is a bijection from WW to the set B\G/BB \backslash G / B of double cosets of GG with respect to BB.

It is clear that BWB\mathrm{BWB} is stable under x↦x−1x \mapsto x^{-1}, and Lemma 1 shows that it is stable under the product. Since it contains BB and NN, it is equal to GG.

It remains to prove that C(w)≠C(w′)C(w) \neq C(w') if w≠w′w \neq w'. For this, we shall prove by induction on the integer qq the following assertion:

(A_q) If ww and w′w' are distinct elements of WW such that lS(w)≥lS(w′)=ql_S(w) \geq l_S(w') = q, then C(w)≠C(w′)C(w) \neq C(w').

(For the definition of lS(w)l_S(w), see § 1, no. 1.)

This assertion is clear for q=0q = 0, since then w′=1w' = 1 and w≠1w \neq 1, hence C(w′)=BC(w') = B and C(w)≠BC(w) \neq B.

Assume that q≥1q \geq 1 and that w,w′w, w' satisfy the hypotheses of (A_q). There exists s∈Ss \in S such that sw′sw' is of length q−1q - 1. We have

lS(w)>lS(sw′) l_S(w) > l_S(sw')

hence w≠sw′w \neq sw'. Moreover, sw≠sw′sw \neq sw'; by formula (3) of § 1, no. 1, we have

lS(sw)≥lS(w)−1≥lS(sw′)=q−1. l_S(sw) \geq l_S(w) - 1 \geq l_S(sw') = q - 1.

By the induction hypothesis, C(sw′)C(sw') is distinct from C(w)C(w) and from C(sw)C(sw); from formula (2) it follows that

C(sw′)∩C(s).C(w)=∅. C(sw') \cap C(s).C(w) = \varnothing.

Since C(sw′)⊂C(s).C(w′)C(sw') \subset C(s).C(w'), we have finally that C(w)≠C(w′)C(w) \neq C(w').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.