Bourbaki

Theorem 5

Tag 0ANV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ANV].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 2. Tits Systems

Let Z be the intersection of the conjugates of B, let U be a subgroup of B and let G1 be the subgroup generated by the conjugates of U in G. We make the following assumptions:*

(1) U is normal in B and B = UT. (2) U has property (R). (3) G1 is equal to its commutator subgroup*. (4) The Coxeter system (W, S) is irreducible (cf. §1, no. 9).

Then every subgroup H of G normalised by G1 is either contained in Z or contains G_1*.

First we show that G = G1 T*. The group G1TG_1 T contains B and hence is its own normaliser (Th. 4); but as N normalises G1G_1 and T, it also normalises G1TG_1 T, so N⊂G1TN \subset G_1 T. Since G is generated by B and N, it follows that G=G1TG = G_1 T.

Next, set

G′=G1H,B′=B∩G′,N′=N∩G′,T′=T∩G′=B′∩N′andW′=N′/T′. G' = G_1 H, \quad B' = B \cap G', \quad N' = N \cap G', T' = T \cap G' = B' \cap N' \quad \text{and} \quad W' = N'/T'.

We have G=G′TG = G'T since G′G' contains G1G_1, and hence N=N′TN = N'T. The inclusion of N′N' into N thus defines, on passing to the quotient, an isomorphism α:W′→W\alpha : W' \to W. Let S′=α−1(S)S' = \alpha^{-1}(S).

We now show that (G', B', N', S') is a Tits system. Since G=BNBG = BNB and B=TU=UTB = TU = UT, we have G=UNUG = UNU. Since U is a subgroup of G′G', it follows that G′=UN′UG' = UN'U; since U⊂B′U \subset B', this proves (T1). Axiom (T2) is satisfied since α\alpha is an isomorphism. Let w∈Ww \in W and let w′=α−1(w)w' = \alpha^{-1}(w) be the corresponding element of W′W'. We have

BwB=BwB′=Bw′B′,since B=B′T. BwB = BwB' = Bw'B', \quad \text{since } B = B'T.

From this we conclude that G′∩BwB=B′w′B′G' \cap BwB = B'w'B', which means that the inclusion of G′G' into G defines on passing to the quotient a bijection from

B'\setminus G'/B' to B\setminus G/B. Axiom (T3) follows immediately. Axiom (T4) follows from B = B'T.

The subgroup H is normal in G'. By Lemma 2 applied to (G', B', N', S'), there exists a subset X' of S' such that B'H = G'_X', and every element of S' - X' commutes with every element of X'. In view of assumption (4), there are only two possibilities:

a) X' = \varnothing, i.e. B'H = B', so H \subset B' \subset B. If g \in G, then g = g_1 t with g_1 \in G_1, t \in T, and H \subset g_1 B g_1^{-1} since G_1 normalises H. Thus H \subset g B g^{-1}, and since Z is the intersection of the g B g^{-1}, we have H \subset Z.

b) X' = S', i.e. B'H = G'. Since G = G'T, we have

G=B′HT=HB′T=HB. G = B'HT = HB'T = HB.

As B normalises U, every conjugate of U is of the form hUh^{-1} with h \in H. Such a subgroup is contained in the group UH, hence G_1 \subset UH by the definition of G_1. Thus, we have the isomorphisms

U/(U∩H)≅UH/H=G1H/H≅G1/(G1∩H). U/(U \cap H) \cong UH/H = G_1 H/H \cong G_1/(G_1 \cap H).

By assumption (3), G_1/(G_1 \cap H) is equal to its commutator subgroup. Assumption (2) now shows that the group U/(U \cap H), which is isomorphic to G_1/(G_1 \cap H), reduces to the identity element. Hence G_1 \cap H = G_1 and G_1 \subset H, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.