Lemma 2
Tag 0ANU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ANU].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 2. Tits Systems
Let be a normal subgroup of . There exists a subset of such that and such that every element of commutes with every element of .
Since is a subgroup of containing , there exists a unique subset of such that (Th. 3).
Let and ; let and be representatives in of and , respectively. Then and there exists such that . Since is normal in , the element of belongs to . This means that
If the length of is equal to 3, Cor. 1 of Th. 2 implies that
(6) If is a subgroup of a group , the normaliser of in is the subgroup consisting of the elements of such that . A subgroup is said to normalise if , in which case is a subgroup of in which is normal.
and hence that . Since is non-empty, . As is a reduced decomposition, it follows that , contrary to our assumption.
Thus ; if , then and so , or . If , property (E) of §1, no. 5 implies that , since . Q.E.D.
The following property of a group U enters into Th. 5 below:
(R) For any normal subgroup V of U distinct from U, the commutator subgroup (cf. Algebra, Chap. I, §6, no. 8) of U/V is distinct from U/V.
Every soluble group satisfies (R); in particular, every abelian group satisfies (R). It can be shown that the symmetric group satisfies (R) (cf. Exerc. 29).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.