Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0APK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0APK].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 2. Reflections

Let G be a group and ρ\rho an irreducible linear representation of G on a vector space V; assume that there exists an element g of G such that ρ(g)\rho(g) is a pseudo-reflection.

(i) Every endomorphism of V commuting with ρ(G)\rho(G) is a homothety, and ρ\rho is absolutely irreducible.

(ii) Assume that V is finite dimensional. Let B be a non-zero bilinear form on V invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G). Then B is non-degenerate, either symmetric or skew-symmetric, and every bilinear form on V invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G) is proportional to B.

Let u be an endomorphism of V commuting with ρ(G)\rho(G). Let g be an element of G such that ρ(g)\rho(g) is a pseudo-reflection and let D be the image of 1−ρ(g)1 - \rho(g). Since D is of dimension 1 and u(D)⊂Du(D) \subset D, there exists α\alpha in K such that u−α.1u - \alpha . 1 vanishes on D; the kernel N of u−α.1u - \alpha . 1 is then a vector subspace of V invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G) and is non-zero as it contains D; since ρ\rho is irreducible, N=VN = V and u=α.1u = \alpha . 1. The second part of (i) follows from the first by Algebra, Chap. VIII, § 13, no. 4, Cor. of Prop. 5.

Let N (resp. N′N') be the subspace of V consisting of those x such that B(x,y)=0B(x, y) = 0 (resp. B(y,x)=0B(y, x) = 0) for all y in V; since B is invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G), the subspaces N and N′N' of V are stable under ρ(G)\rho(G) and distinct from V since B≠0B \neq 0. Since ρ\rho is irreducible, N=N′=0N = N' = 0 and B is non-degenerate.

Since V is finite dimensional, every bilinear form on V is given by the formula

B′(x,y)=B(u(x),y) B'(x, y) = B(u(x), y)
for some endomorphism u of V. If B′B' is invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G), the endomorphism u commutes with ρ(G)\rho(G). Indeed, let x,yx, y be in V and let g be in G; since B and B′B' are invariant under ρ(G)\rho(G), we have
B(u(ρ(g)(x)),y)=B′(ρ(g)(x),y)=B′(x,ρ(g−1)(y))=B(u(x),ρ(g−1)(y))=B(ρ(g)(u(x)),y), \begin{align*} B(u(\rho(g)(x)), y) &= B'(\rho(g)(x), y) = B'(x, \rho(g^{-1})(y)) \\ &= B(u(x), \rho(g^{-1})(y)) = B(\rho(g)(u(x)), y), \end{align*}
hence u(ρ(g)(x))=ρ(g)(u(x))u(\rho(g)(x)) = \rho(g)(u(x)) since B is non-degenerate. By (i), there exists α\alpha in K with u=α.1u = \alpha.1, so B′=α.BB' = \alpha.B.

In particular, we can apply this to the bilinear form B′(x,y)=B(y,x)B'(x, y) = B(y, x); then B(y,x)=α.B(x,y)=α2.B(y,x)B(y, x) = \alpha.B(x, y) = \alpha^2.B(y, x) for all x,yx, y in V, and since B is nonzero we have α2=1\alpha^2 = 1, hence α=1\alpha = 1 or α=−1\alpha = -1. Thus, B is either symmetric or skew-symmetric.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.