Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0ASP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ASP].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 5. Invariants in the symmetric algebra

Let K be a commutative field, V a finite dimensional vector space over K, S = S(V) the symmetric algebra of V, G a finite group of automorphisms of V, and R the graded subalgebra of S consisting of the elements invariant under G. Assume that G is generated by pseudo-reflections (§ 2, no. 1) and that q=Card(G)q = \mathrm{Card}(G) is coprime to the characteristic of K. Then the R-module S has a basis consisting of q homogeneous elements.

a) Since every submodule of S/(R+S)S/(R_+S) is free over R0=KR_0 = K, it is enough to show (in view of Algebra, Chap. II, §11, no. 4, Prop. 7) that the canonical homomorphism from R+⊗RSR_+ \otimes_R S to S is injective. For any R-module E, denote by T(E) the R-module Ker(R+⊗RE→E)\mathrm{Ker}(R_+ \otimes_R E \to E) (\*in other words, T(E)=Tor1R(R/R+,E)T(E) = \mathrm{Tor}_1^R(R/R_+, E)\*). If E, E′E' are two R-modules and uu is a homomorphism from E to E′E', the homomorphism 1⊗u1 \otimes u from R+⊗ER_+ \otimes E to R+⊗E′R_+ \otimes E' defines by restriction to T(E) a homomorphism from T(E) to T(E′E') that we denote by T(u)T(u). If u′u' is a homomorphism from E′E' to an R-module E′′E'', we have T(u′∘u)=T(u′)∘T(u)T(u' \circ u) = T(u') \circ T(u). Thus, if G acts R-linearly on E, then G acts on T(E).

b) The group G acts R-linearly on S, and hence also on T(S). Moreover, T(S) has a natural structure of graded S-module. We show first that, if g∈Gg \in G, then gg transforms every element xx of T(S) into an element congruent to xx modulo S1T(S)S_1 T(S). It is enough to do this when gg is a pseudo-reflection. Then there exists a non-zero vector vv in V such that g(x)−x∈Kvg(x) - x \in K v for all x∈Vx \in V. Since V generates S, it follows that gSg_S acts trivially on S/SvS/Sv. Thus, for any y∈Sy \in S, there exists an element h(y)h(y) in S such that

gS(y)−y=h(y)v. g_S(y) - y = h(y)v.

Since S is integral and vv is non-zero, this element is determined uniquely by yy; it is immediate that hh is an endomorphism of degree – 1 of the R-module S. Thus, gS−1S=mv∘hg_S - 1_S = m_v \circ h, where mvm_v denotes the homothety with ratio vv in S. Hence,

T(gS)−1T(S)=T(gS−1S)=T(mv)∘T(h), T(g_S) - 1_{T(S)} = T(g_S - 1_S) = T(m_v) \circ T(h),

the image of which is contained in vT(S)vT(S), proving our assertion.

c) We show that any element of T(S) invariant under G is zero. Indeed, let Q be the endomorphism of the R-module S defined by

Q(y)=q−1∑g∈GgS(y) Q(y) = q^{-1} \sum_{g \in G} g_S(y)

for all y∈Sy \in S. Then Q(S)=RQ(S) = R. We can thus write Q=i∘Q′Q = i \circ Q', where Q′Q' is a homomorphism from the R-module S to the R-module R and ii denotes the canonical injection of R into S. Thus T(Q)=T(i)∘T(Q′)T(Q) = T(i) \circ T(Q') and T(Q′)=0T(Q') = 0 since T(R)=Ker(R+⊗R→R)=0T(R) = \mathrm{Ker}(R_+ \otimes R \to R) = 0. Thus

0=T(Q)=q−1∑g∈GT(gS). 0 = T(Q) = q^{-1} \sum_{g \in G} T(g_S).

But q−1∑g∈GT(gS)q^{-1} \sum_{g \in G} T(g_S) leaves fixed the elements of T(S) invariant under G. These elements are therefore zero.

d) Assume that T(S)≠0T(S) \neq 0. There exists in T(S) a homogeneous element u≠0u \neq 0 of minimum degree. By b), uu is invariant under G. By c), u=0u = 0. This is a contradiction, so T(S)=0T(S) = 0. Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.