Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 05YK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05YK].

Algebra, chapter II, § 11. Graded modules and rings

*Suppose that Δ=Z\Delta = \mathbf{Z}. With the hypotheses on A\mathbf{A} and M\mathbf{M} of Proposition 6, consider the graded A0\mathbf{A}_0-module N=M/J0M\mathbf{N} = \mathbf{M}/\mathfrak{J}_0 \mathbf{M} and suppose the following conditions hold: (i) each of the NλN_\lambda considered as an A0\mathbf{A}_0-module admits a basis (yiλ)i∈Iλ(y_{i\lambda})_{i \in I_\lambda}; (ii) the canonical homomorphism J0⊗AM→M\mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes_{\mathbf{A}} \mathbf{M} \to \mathbf{M} is injective.

Then M\mathbf{M} is a graded free A\mathbf{A}-module (no. 2, Remark 3) and, to be precise, if xiλx_{i\lambda} is an element of MλM_\lambda whose image in NλN_\lambda is yiλy_{i\lambda}, the family (xiλ)(i,λ)∈I(x_{i\lambda})_{(i, \lambda) \in I} (where II is the set the sum of the IλI_\lambda) is a basis of M\mathbf{M}.*

We know (no. 2, Remark 3) that there is a graded free A\mathbf{A}-module L\mathbf{L} (of graduation (Lλ)(L_\lambda)) and a surjective homomorphism p:L→Mp : \mathbf{L} \to \mathbf{M} of degree 0 such that p(eiλ)=xiλp(e_{i\lambda}) = x_{i\lambda} for all (i,λ)∈I(i, \lambda) \in I ((eiλ)(i,λ)∈I(e_{i\lambda})_{(i, \lambda) \in I} being a basis of L\mathbf{L} consisting of homogeneous elements eiλ∈Lλe_{i\lambda} \in L_\lambda). It follows from the above Remark that pp is surjective. Consider the graded A\mathbf{A}-module R=Ker(p)\mathbf{R} = \mathrm{Ker}(p) and note that Rλ={0}R_\lambda = \{0\} for λ<λ0\lambda < \lambda_0 by definition; we need to prove that R={0}\mathbf{R} = \{0\} and by Proposition 6 it will suffice to show that J0R=R\mathfrak{J}_0 R = R. Consider the commutative diagram (§ 3, no. 6, Proposition 5)

J0⊗R→1⊗jJ0⊗L→1⊗pJ0⊗M⟶0↓a↓b↓c0⟶R→fL→pM⟶0 \begin{array}{ccccccccc} \mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes R & \xrightarrow{1 \otimes j} & \mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes L & \xrightarrow{1 \otimes p} & \mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\ \downarrow a & & \downarrow b & & \downarrow c & & \\ 0 & \longrightarrow & R & \xrightarrow{f} & L & \xrightarrow{p} & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \end{array}

where jj is the canonical injection, a,b,ca, b, c deriving from the canonical injection J0→A\mathfrak{J}_0 \to A (§ 3, no. 4, Proposition 4); it must be shown that aa is surjective. Note that, as LL is free, bb is injective (§ 3, no. 7, Corollary 6 to Proposition 7) and cc is injective by hypothesis. Then let tt be an element of RR and tt its class in R/J0RR / \mathfrak{J}_0 R; then there is an exact sequence (§ 3, no. 6, Proposition 5 and Corollary 2 to Proposition 6)

R/J0R→jL/J0L→pˉM/J0M⟶0 R / \mathfrak{J}_0 R \xrightarrow{j} L / \mathfrak{J}_0 L \xrightarrow{\bar{p}} M / \mathfrak{J}_0 M \longrightarrow 0

where jj and pˉ\bar{p} derive from jj and pp when passing to the quotients and pˉ\bar{p} is by hypothesis a bijection; then j(tˉ)=0j(\bar{t}) = 0, in other words j(t)∈J0Lj(t) \in \mathfrak{J}_0 L. Then there is an element z∈J0⊗Lz \in \mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes L such that j(t)=b(z)j(t) = b(z); as p(b(z))=0p(b(z)) = 0, c((1⊗p)(z))=0c((1 \otimes p)(z)) = 0 and, as cc is injective, (1⊗p)(z)=0(1 \otimes p)(z) = 0. In other words, zz is the image of an element t′∈J0⊗Rt' \in \mathfrak{J}_0 \otimes R under 1⊗j1 \otimes j and then j(a(t′))=b(z)=j(t)j(a(t')) = b(z) = j(t); as jj is injective, this implies t=a(t′)t = a(t').

We shall show later (Commutative Algebra, II, § 3, no. 2, Proposition 5) how this proposition can be extended to non-graded modules.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.