Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 05P2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05P2].

Algebra, chapter II, § 3. Tensor products

Let E, E', E'' be right A-*modules*, F a left A-*module* and

(14)

E′→uE→vE′′→0 E' \xrightarrow{u} E \xrightarrow{v} E'' \to 0

an exact sequence of linear mappings. Writing uˉ=u⊗1F,vˉ=v⊗1F,\bar{u} = u \otimes 1_F, \bar{v} = v \otimes 1_F, the sequence

(15)

E′⊗AF→uˉE⊗AF→vˉE′′⊗AF→0 E' \otimes_A F \xrightarrow{\bar{u}} E \otimes_A F \xrightarrow{\bar{v}} E'' \otimes_A F \to 0

of Z\mathbf{Z}-*homomorphisms* is exact.

By virtue of no. 2, formula (5), vˉ∘uˉ=(v∘u)⊗1F=0\bar{v} \circ \bar{u} = (v \circ u) \otimes 1_F = 0; the image H=uˉ(E′⊗F)H = \bar{u}(E' \otimes F) is contained in the kernel L=Ker⁡(vˉ)L = \operatorname{Ker}(\bar{v}); by passing to the quotient, we therefore derive from vˉ\bar{v} a Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping ff of the cokernel M=(E⊗F)/HM = (E \otimes F)/H of uˉ\bar{u} into E′′⊗FE'' \otimes F; it must be proved that ff is bijective and it will hence suffice to define a Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping g:E′′⊗F→Mg : E'' \otimes F \to M such that g∘fg \circ f and f∘gf \circ g are the identity mappings.

Let x′′∈E′′x'' \in E'', y∈Fy \in F; by hypothesis there exists x∈Ex \in E such that v(x)=x′′v(x) = x''. We show that, if x1,x2x_1, x_2 are two elements of E such that v(x1)=v(x2)=x′′v(x_1) = v(x_2) = x'' and ϕ:E⊗F→M\phi : E \otimes F \to M is the canonical mapping, then ϕ(x1⊗y)=ϕ(x2⊗y)\phi(x_1 \otimes y) = \phi(x_2 \otimes y). It suffices to prove that if v(x)=0v(x) = 0 then ϕ(x⊗y)=0\phi(x \otimes y) = 0, which follows from the fact that x=u(x′)x = u(x') with x′∈E′x' \in E', whence x⊗y=u(x′)⊗y=uˉ(x′⊗y)∈Hx \otimes y = u(x') \otimes y = \bar{u}(x' \otimes y) \in H. If (x′′,y)(x'', y) is mapped to the unique value of ϕ(x⊗y)\phi(x \otimes y) for all x∈Ex \in E such that v(x)=x′′v(x) = x'', a mapping is defined of E′′×FE'' \times F into M; this mapping is Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear and satisfies conditions (1) (no. 1), since v(xλ)=x′′λv(x \lambda) = x'' \lambda and (xλ)⊗y=x⊗(λy)(x \lambda) \otimes y = x \otimes (\lambda y) for x∈Ex \in E; hence there is a Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping gg of E′′⊗FE'' \otimes F into M such that g(x′′⊗y)=ϕ(x⊗y)g(x'' \otimes y) = \phi(x \otimes y) for y∈F,x∈Ey \in F, x \in E and x′′=v(x)x'' = v(x). This definition further proves that f∘gf \circ g coincides with the identity mapping for the elements of

E′′⊗FE'' \otimes F of the form x′′⊗yx'' \otimes y and hence f∘gf \circ g is the identity mapping of E′′⊗FE'' \otimes F; on the other hand, for x∈Ex \in E and y∈Fy \in F, f(ϕ(x⊗y))=v(x)⊗yf(\phi(x \otimes y)) = v(x) \otimes y by definition, hence g(f(ϕ(x⊗y)))=ϕ(x⊗y)g(f(\phi(x \otimes y))) = \phi(x \otimes y) and, as the elements of the form ϕ(x⊗y)\phi(x \otimes y) generate M, g∘fg \circ f is the identity mapping of M.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.