Assume that W is irreducible and that dimV≥2. With the preceding notation, there exist two linearly independent vectors z′,z′′ such that (i) the plane P generated by z′,z′′ is stable under s' and s''; (ii) s'|P and s''|P are orthogonal reflections with respect to Rz′ and Rz′′; (iii) z′,z′′∈C, and P∩C is the set of linear combinations of z′,z′′ with coefficients > 0.
Let (e1,…,el) be the basis of V such that (ei∣ej)=δij. Then C is the open simplicial cone determined by the ei (§ 3, no. 9, Prop. 7). It is clear that V′ is generated by er+1,…,el and V′′ by e1,…,er. Let q be the endomorphism of V such that q(e1)=e1,…,q(el)=el. Its matrix with respect to (e1,…,el) is Q=((ei∣ej)). We have (ei∣ej)≤0 for i=j (§ 3, no. 4, Prop. 3). Since W is irreducible, there does not exist any partition {1,2,…,l}=I1∪I2 such that (ei∣ej)=0 for i∈I1 and j∈I2. Thus (§ 3, no. 5, Lemma 4) Q has an eigenvector (a1,…,al) all of whose coordinates are > 0; let a be the corresponding eigenvalue. Put
z=a1e1+⋯+alel,
z′′=a1e1+⋯+arer∈V′′∩C,
z′=ar+1er+1+⋯+alel∈V′∩C,
and let P be the plane generated by z′ and z′′. Then P∩C is the set of linear combinations of z′ and z′′ with coefficients >0. The relation q(z)=az gives ∑j=1lajej=∑j=1laajej; scalar multiplying by ek (where k≤r) gives
ak+j=r+1∑laj(ej∣ek)=aak; thus (a−1)z′′=k=1∑r(j=r+1∑laj(ej∣ek))ek =j=r+1∑laj(k=1∑r(ej∣ek)ek) =j=r+1∑laj(−ej+k=1∑l(ej∣ek)ek) =−z′+j=r+1∑lajej.
Thus, (a−1)z′′+z′ is orthogonal to e1,…,er, that is, to V′′. Hence, s′′ leaves stable the plane generated by z′′ and (a−1)z′′+z′, that is, P. Similarly, s′ leaves P stable. Since z′∈P∩V′ and z′′∈P∩V′′, s′∣P and s′′∣P are the reflections with respect to Rz′ and Rz′′.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.