Then(x∣y)is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form onV, invariant underA(R). Forx,y∈VQwe have(x∣y)∈Q. The canonical extension of(x∣y)to
VR=VQ⊗QR
is non-degenerate and positive.
It is clear that (x∣y) is a symmetric bilinear form on V. If g∈A(R),
(g(x)∣g(y))=α∈R∑⟨tg(α~),x⟩⟨tg(α~),y⟩=(x∣y)
since tg)(R~)=R~. If x,y∈VQ, then (x∣y)∈Q by (RS_{III}). If z∈VR, then (z∣z)=∑α∈R⟨α~,z⟩2≥0, and (z∣z)>0 if z=0 by Prop. 1, so the canonical extension of (x∣y) to VR is positive and non-degenerate. The restriction of (x∣y) to VQ is thus non-degenerate, and hence the form (x∣y) on V is non-degenerate.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.