Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0AUC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AUC].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 1. Root systems

For x,y∈Vx, y \in V, put

(x∣y)=∑α∈R⟨α~,x⟩⟨α~,y⟩. (x|y) = \sum_{\alpha \in R} \langle \alpha \tilde{}, x \rangle \langle \alpha \tilde{}, y \rangle.
Then (x∣y)(x|y) is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form on VV, invariant under A(R)A(R). For x,y∈VQx, y \in V_{\mathbf{Q}} we have (x∣y)∈Q(x|y) \in \mathbf{Q}. The canonical extension of (x∣y)(x|y) to
VR=VQ⊗QR V_{\mathbf{R}} = V_{\mathbf{Q}} \otimes_{\mathbf{Q}} \mathbf{R}
is non-degenerate and positive.

It is clear that (x∣y)(x|y) is a symmetric bilinear form on VV. If g∈A(R)g \in A(R),

(g(x)∣g(y))=∑α∈R⟨tg(α~),x⟩⟨tg(α~),y⟩=(x∣y) (g(x)|g(y)) = \sum_{\alpha \in R} \langle {}^t g(\alpha \tilde{}), x \rangle \langle {}^t g(\alpha \tilde{}), y \rangle = (x|y)
since tg)(R~)=R~{}^t g)(R \tilde{}) = R \tilde{}. If x,y∈VQx, y \in V_{\mathbf{Q}}, then (x∣y)∈Q(x|y) \in \mathbf{Q} by (RS_{III}). If z∈VRz \in V_{\mathbf{R}}, then (z∣z)=∑α∈R⟨α~,z⟩2≥0(z|z) = \sum_{\alpha \in R} \langle \alpha \tilde{}, z \rangle^2 \geq 0, and (z∣z)>0(z|z) > 0 if z≠0z \neq 0 by Prop. 1, so the canonical extension of (x∣y)(x|y) to VRV_{\mathbf{R}} is positive and non-degenerate. The restriction of (x∣y)(x|y) to VQV_{\mathbf{Q}} is thus non-degenerate, and hence the form (x∣y)(x|y) on VV is non-degenerate.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.